Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axelle Despiegelaere

Axelle Despiegelaere

Axelle Despiegelaere (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She was "discovered" at the world cup, signed a contract with L'Oreal and they ended it 3 days later. She's not notable. Not yet anyway. Redirect to 2014 FIFA World Cup or L'Oréal. Fails WP:NMODEL. Any sourecs about her are just about her signing a contract with L'Oreal. That's it, nothing about her, just the contract. I don't find that note worthy. LADY LOTUS • TALK 16:59, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

• But passes WP:GNG which has primacy I believe? Certainly widespread, if misplaced in my belief, coverage. Perhaps she is not notable as a model, but as an internet viral phenomenon. Brigade Piron (talk) 17:06, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

What are other examples of "internet viral phenomenon" with their own Wikipedia article? LADY LOTUS • TALK 17:09, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 17:11, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 17:12, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Delete - Her "fame" is a one-time event. WP is not a news agency or a newspaper specialized on magazine news. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 18:24, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

• Delete She just got recruited with a contact. If this goes somewhere, she might eventually pass notability, but she does not at this time.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:18, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
• Delete Her page should be deleted, she is not a Belgian model, she is just a student who got her picture in the media by chance, L'oreal stopped its contract with her before it even started. If every time someone goes viral they get a wikipedia page, it will end up full of people with their 15 minutes of fame and that kind of information is not relevant at all in my opinion. KenzaLynn (talk) 20:59, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

• Delete: Not notable. Perhaps the incident can be a footnote in the 2014 World Cup article. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 05:04, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

• Delete article but don't remove content: I agree with the others this isn't notable enough. However, the information in this article shouldn't be deleted altogether either. It is quite useful content that should be included in another related article, perhaps 2014 FIFA World Cup. --Kimberlylambert (talk) 09:27, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
• Delete: I wouldn't be surprised to see her parlay this publicity into modeling work for other (lesser) companies, but as of right now, this person is just a student involved in a bit of one-time World Cup trivia.  Mbinebri  ^{talk ←} 15:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

• "'Delete"': She's beautiful, but not news worthy. Her contract was ended after 13 days. Though I do not agree it should have been ended, the fact reminds, it was ended. She she reappears in the media or on the world stage, then she might deserve a page. But not right now.Jonathon The Impaler (talk) 11:59, 12 July 2014 (UTC)