Jump to content

Talk:Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 18: Line 18:
===Discussion===
===Discussion===
The question of which title is correct; "Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot" or "Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot", has not been addressed yet, so the direction of the merge is not clear at all. [[User:Dodger67|Roger (Dodger67)]] ([[User talk:Dodger67|talk]]) 07:35, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
The question of which title is correct; "Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot" or "Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot", has not been addressed yet, so the direction of the merge is not clear at all. [[User:Dodger67|Roger (Dodger67)]] ([[User talk:Dodger67|talk]]) 07:35, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Dodger67 - for years it was called the Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot however my recent research shows that the hardware, software and the patent's implementation rests with Boeing and Honeywell (via the Apollo and Darkstar aided by the Technology Reinvestment Project with NASA assisting with fly-by-wire and the glass-cockpit). Thus the (noun) '''Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot''' (BHUAP).

It is in fact different to the previous BUAP in that it is backed up fully with documentation, citations, patents, precedents, type-certificates etc, not just based on hear-say about the QRS11 gyrochip (which was actually true for the 1995 version of the ADIRS) but an accelerometer can't fly an aircraft for example. My vote is for Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot.[[User:Noordinaryjohn|John (Noordinaryjohn)]] ([[User talk:Noordinaryjohn|talk]]) 07:55, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:55, 21 July 2014

WikiProject iconAviation Redirect‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconRobotics Redirect‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconElectronics NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk page
NAThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Comments

After much research we decided to create a new technical page on this subject and have linked it to this article. There is a lot more information on how it actually works that will be added over time and we can't guarantee that the page will not in fact get deleted as a result, because it proves the existence of the BUAP from 1995. They won't like that... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noordinaryjohn (talkcontribs) 03:34, 20 July 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate: Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot duplicates scope of Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot and should merge there

Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) duplicates scope of Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and should merge here -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 07:10, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Support - There was no 2007 contract to install the BUAP, that was just the date that Boeing admitted to the ALREADY INSTALLED patent of 2003. They had to admit this because they were being sued by an American pilot. The technical evidence shows that it was first installed in 1995 in the AIMS-1 and significantly upgraded in AIMS-2 in 2000. It was first witnessed in action in late 1996. - Noordinaryjohn

Discussion

The question of which title is correct; "Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot" or "Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot", has not been addressed yet, so the direction of the merge is not clear at all. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:35, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dodger67 - for years it was called the Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot however my recent research shows that the hardware, software and the patent's implementation rests with Boeing and Honeywell (via the Apollo and Darkstar aided by the Technology Reinvestment Project with NASA assisting with fly-by-wire and the glass-cockpit). Thus the (noun) Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot (BHUAP).

It is in fact different to the previous BUAP in that it is backed up fully with documentation, citations, patents, precedents, type-certificates etc, not just based on hear-say about the QRS11 gyrochip (which was actually true for the 1995 version of the ADIRS) but an accelerometer can't fly an aircraft for example. My vote is for Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot.John (Noordinaryjohn) (talk) 07:55, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]