Talk:Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot: Difference between revisions
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
The question of which title is correct; "Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot" or "Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot", has not been addressed yet, so the direction of the merge is not clear at all. [[User:Dodger67|Roger (Dodger67)]] ([[User talk:Dodger67|talk]]) 07:35, 21 July 2014 (UTC) |
The question of which title is correct; "Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot" or "Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot", has not been addressed yet, so the direction of the merge is not clear at all. [[User:Dodger67|Roger (Dodger67)]] ([[User talk:Dodger67|talk]]) 07:35, 21 July 2014 (UTC) |
||
Dodger67 - for years it was called the Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot however my recent research shows that the hardware, software and the patent's implementation rests with Boeing and Honeywell (via the Apollo and Darkstar aided by the Technology Reinvestment Project with NASA assisting with fly-by-wire and the glass-cockpit). Thus the (noun) '''Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot''' (BHUAP). |
Dodger67 - for years it was called the Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot however my recent research shows that the hardware, software and the patent's implementation rests with Boeing and Honeywell (via the Apollo and Darkstar aided by the Technology Reinvestment Project with NASA assisting with fly-by-wire and the glass-cockpit). Thus the (noun) '''Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot''' (BHUAP) which is backed up fully with documentation, citations, patents, precedents, type-certificates etc. My vote is for Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot. By the way, Gaan die Bokkies! [[User:Noordinaryjohn|John (Noordinaryjohn)]] ([[User talk:Noordinaryjohn|talk]]) 07:55, 21 July 2014 (UTC) |
||
It is in fact different to the previous BUAP in that it is backed up fully with documentation, citations, patents, precedents, type-certificates etc, not just based on hear-say about the QRS11 gyrochip (which was actually true for the 1995 version of the ADIRS) but an accelerometer can't fly an aircraft for example. My vote is for Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot. By the way, Gaan die Bokkies! [[User:Noordinaryjohn|John (Noordinaryjohn)]] ([[User talk:Noordinaryjohn|talk]]) 07:55, 21 July 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:37, 21 July 2014
Aviation Redirect‑class | |||||||
|
Robotics Redirect‑class | |||||||
|
Electronics NA‑class | |||||||
|
Comments
After much research we decided to create a new technical page on this subject and have linked it to this article. There is a lot more information on how it actually works that will be added over time and we can't guarantee that the page will not in fact get deleted as a result, because it proves the existence of the BUAP from 1995. They won't like that... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noordinaryjohn (talk • contribs) 03:34, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate: Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot duplicates scope of Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot and should merge there
It has been suggested that this page be merged with Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot and Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot. (Discuss) |
Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) duplicates scope of Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and should merge here -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 07:10, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Survey
- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''
or*'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with~~~~
. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
Support - The Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot page is incorrect - There was no 2007 contract to install the BUAP, that was just the date that Boeing admitted to the ALREADY INSTALLED patent of 2003. They had to admit this because they were being sued by an American pilot. The technical evidence shows that it was first installed in 1995 in the AIMS-1 and significantly upgraded in AIMS-2 in 2000. It was first witnessed in action in late 1996. - Noordinaryjohn
Discussion
The question of which title is correct; "Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot" or "Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot", has not been addressed yet, so the direction of the merge is not clear at all. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:35, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Dodger67 - for years it was called the Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot however my recent research shows that the hardware, software and the patent's implementation rests with Boeing and Honeywell (via the Apollo and Darkstar aided by the Technology Reinvestment Project with NASA assisting with fly-by-wire and the glass-cockpit). Thus the (noun) Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot (BHUAP) which is backed up fully with documentation, citations, patents, precedents, type-certificates etc. My vote is for Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot. By the way, Gaan die Bokkies! John (Noordinaryjohn) (talk) 07:55, 21 July 2014 (UTC)