Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EleMints (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)</small> |
||
*Could you comment on the four sources cited by a participant in the previous AFD, as to why they may not be reliable or shouldn't count towards establishing notability? '''[[User:Postdlf|postdlf]]''' (''[[User talk:Postdlf|talk]]'') 21:43, 12 August 2014 (UTC) |
*Could you comment on the four sources cited by a participant in the previous AFD, as to why they may not be reliable or shouldn't count towards establishing notability? '''[[User:Postdlf|postdlf]]''' (''[[User talk:Postdlf|talk]]'') 21:43, 12 August 2014 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''. Fails [[WP:GNG]]. No reliable independent sources. Appearing on the app store doesn't constitute notability. And the BW "source" from the last AfD don't even mention this product. -- [[Special:Contributions/101.117.89.21|101.117.89.21]] ([[User talk:101.117.89.21|talk]]) 02:09, 13 August 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:09, 13 August 2014
AfDs for this article:
- EleMints (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn (talk) 11:56, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Could you comment on the four sources cited by a participant in the previous AFD, as to why they may not be reliable or shouldn't count towards establishing notability? postdlf (talk) 21:43, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG. No reliable independent sources. Appearing on the app store doesn't constitute notability. And the BW "source" from the last AfD don't even mention this product. -- 101.117.89.21 (talk) 02:09, 13 August 2014 (UTC)