User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom: Difference between revisions
clean up |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
==What's with the ip socks?== |
==What's with the ip socks?== |
||
Are there any SPI, ANI, etc discussions related to the ip's reverting your edits? ({{user|87.112.71.198}} and {{user|31.185.197.136}}) --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] ([[User talk:Ronz|talk]]) 19:36, 15 August 2014 (UTC) |
Are there any SPI, ANI, etc discussions related to the ip's reverting your edits? ({{user|87.112.71.198}} and {{user|31.185.197.136}}) --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] ([[User talk:Ronz|talk]]) 19:36, 15 August 2014 (UTC) |
||
==Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion== |
|||
[[Image:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] |
|||
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. |
|||
Revision as of 02:15, 18 August 2014
← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ←
| This is TheRedPenOfDoom's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20Auto-archiving period: 10 days  |
Index
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
And there is also This archive.
the page Karan Singh Grover was edited and approved by the moderators itself, I don't see what is your problem with it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikki2177 (talk • contribs) 15:44, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
@Nikki2177: There are no 'moderators' on Wikipedia, articles are written and edited collaboratively. No particular editor has any more 'authority' to make edits, or decisions about article content than any other, instead, such decisions are made by a consensus of the community through the edits, reversions, and talk page discussion. If an edit that you make is reverted, the appropriate action to take is to then discuss the issue on the article's talk page, not to keep trying to make the same change. Doing so is considereded to be edit warring, is disruptive, and can result in the blocking of your account.
I can't speak for TRPoD, but you have a history of making inappropriate changes to that article, as is shown by the fact that they have been reverted by multiple editors over time. It seems apparent that you probably have a COI regarding the subject, and thus should not be editing that article at all, but instead suggesting proposed changes on the article's talk page. Reventtalk 20:14, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Susan Lindauer
I'm suspect that Lindauer herself is editing this article, and I kind of feel bad for her if it is the case. Having this article could be an embarrassment for her and possibly be a hindrance as well. As far as notability, or even notoriety, its not really an important article. Would you be opposed to having it deleted?Two kinds of pork (talk) 21:41, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
SPI
Hey, just wanted to give you a heads-up about this: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/TheRedPenOfDoom. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:24, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
What's with the ip socks?
Are there any SPI, ANI, etc discussions related to the ip's reverting your edits? (87.112.71.198 (talk · contribs) and 31.185.197.136 (talk · contribs)) --Ronz (talk) 19:36, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.