Jump to content

Talk:Pitch Perfect: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎help me: new section
Rlp17 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 59: Line 59:
In the credits it says that "The Outfit" did Becca's remixes, but when I try to find them anywhere online its like they dont exist.
In the credits it says that "The Outfit" did Becca's remixes, but when I try to find them anywhere online its like they dont exist.
:I'm an 'EDMer' and love the mixes. Someone please help me find them?
:I'm an 'EDMer' and love the mixes. Someone please help me find them?
::::-[[Special:Contributions/141.165.135.61|141.165.135.61]] ([[User talk:141.165.135.61|talk]]) 05:11, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
::::-♠|RP|♠ 05:13, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:13, 28 August 2014

WikiProject iconFilm: American C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

question

Q. What themes from The Breakfast Club, mentioned in Pitch Perfect's dialog and songs, are also in Pitch Perfect? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evanwolf (talkcontribs) 07:51, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

John Michael Higgins

Would it not be more appropriate to list his credit in A Mighty Wind rather than Arrested Development given it's a film role and he arranged some of the singing?

118.208.0.39 (talk) 23:35, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

A number of IP users (or one user with multiple IPs) has been vandalising the character descriptions by inserting claims that Chloe and Beca are in love and that Chloe is bisexual. I've reverted twice and requested semi-protection for the article, to avoid going into 3RR. Euchrid (talk) 02:10, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It just happened again. I reverted it. --BroMonque (talk) 11:32, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 17 January 2013

A few days ago I made an addition to the article making a reference to the tv series Glee but was removed by another user, but I believe it is a valid statement and fact, and one that should be stated somewhere on the wiki article. The user deleted the article leaving a summary that the reference was a poorly written article but it think that was a defensive action from sometype of an emotional attachment to the movie Pitch Perfect, and the ref URL looks derogatory, the user was IP address 24.5.115.71.

Here is the edit;

The film also reflects many aspects of the TV series Glee, including, characters, dialog, interactions, and plot developments. [1] Pusalieth (talk) 13:32, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Wikipedia articles are based on what reliable sources have published and not on the personal analysis and commentary that we as viewers and editors may personally have made. You will need to provide a source from a professional review site/commentator that makes such a connection if you wish the content to be considered for entry into the article. Wetpaint is a blog site and so it is not a reliable source. many of the hits from news.google.com are generally considered "reliable sources" if you wish to have help focusing your search.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some websites that confirm the same stated statement; http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Hollywood/2012/10/04/pitch-perfect-review http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2012/09/26/pitch-perfect-stars-talk-glee-comparisons/ https://michigandaily.com/arts/10pitch-perfect10 http://ohnotheydidnt.livejournal.com/72364421.html http://www.comingsoon.net/news/reviewsnews.php?id=95310 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/reviews/article-2251435/Pitch-Perfect-review-Rebel-Wilson-star-future-Fat-Amy-hits-right-note.html Surely one of these must meet the qualifications. I am curious though, cannot facts and truths come from anyone, not just "reliable sources", as this term is subject to change, but everyone votes is the sole idea of democracy, which is sole idea of Wikipedia, everyone contributes, the average is correct. Saying information that is verifiable, agreeable, repeatable, and reliable (not reliable source) I believe is a better qualification of posted information. I'm curious if you Googled the similarity between Glee and Pitch Perfect or if you just denied the request based off what you saw as erroneous use of a source. If so doesn't that seem more hierarchical, or Utilitarian, for this idea limits the available sources to be used as information, rather than all sources accepted. I use sources in the strict definition, as in this case, and perhaps others, the source is being misused as conclusion. If I have posted this statement in the incorrect area, I apologize.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pusalieth (talkcontribs)

Not done: You should be able to do this edit yourself. Though I would suggest not, because it will just get removed again. -Nathan Johnson (talk) 22:39, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
and just to clarify, it will be undone if you attempt to use those sites as they do not meet the WP:RS guidelines. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:41, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It is 100% mistaken to say "everyone votes is the sole idea of democracy, which is sole idea of Wikipedia, everyone contributes, the average is correct". Wikipedia does not work by voting, or by some simplistic idea that what the majority of people think is best, let alone the bizarre notion that what the majority of people think is "correct". And no, we do not accept things from just anyone, not from reliable sources, because some sources just aren't reliable, in fact some sources are full of gross inaccuracies, and it would be crazy to accept them as being as valid as those that are reliable. you may or may not find it instructive to read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a democracy. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:08, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

incorrect song identified

The song mentioned in the plot summary is actually Titanium by David Guetta, not Bulletproof by La Roux. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuzzyplastic (talkcontribs) 23:25, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Beginning Paragraph

Every sentance in the opening paragraph begins with "The"; the whole opening paragraph should be restructured. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.95.194.219 (talk) 11:15, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If that movie has an ensemble cast then I am king of Makebelieveistan. Is there a source for this? --92.202.60.11 (talk) 08:24, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sexuality

It is offensively reductionist to define a character by their sexuality. The descriptions do not feel the need to point out the ethnicity of the characters, the sexuality should not be forced into the description because editors cannot think of anything else to write. It is also misleading when the film itself treats it a normal, incidental, almost irrelevant characteristic. Later in the story she admits to a seriously gambling problem (that started after she broke up with her girlfriend) which is an interesting characteristic but it is also not something the article should mention as a character introduction either. Perhaps more of the character descriptions should be shortened or removed entirely, but the description of the character played by Ester Dean is particularly bad and editors should stop trying to force the particular reference about a character being a lesbian. -- 109.76.6.232 (talk) 16:39, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

help me

In the credits it says that "The Outfit" did Becca's remixes, but when I try to find them anywhere online its like they dont exist.

I'm an 'EDMer' and love the mixes. Someone please help me find them?
-♠|RP|♠ 05:13, 28 August 2014 (UTC)