User talk:Kautilya3: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Bladesmulti (talk | contribs)
Line 13: Line 13:
:::::: Okay. Despite our difference of opinion on the content at BGT page I appreciate your concern and efforts. Cheers! --[[User:AmritasyaPutra|<span style="color: #F4C430">AmritasyaPutra</span>✍]] 10:34, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
:::::: Okay. Despite our difference of opinion on the content at BGT page I appreciate your concern and efforts. Cheers! --[[User:AmritasyaPutra|<span style="color: #F4C430">AmritasyaPutra</span>✍]] 10:34, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
:::::: Btw, from my perspective, it was not 'page number issue': I had the given reference and I searched the entire book and did not find it. The edition of the book itself was changed later. I hope you can see my point. --[[User:AmritasyaPutra|<span style="color: #F4C430">AmritasyaPutra</span>✍]] 10:36, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
:::::: Btw, from my perspective, it was not 'page number issue': I had the given reference and I searched the entire book and did not find it. The edition of the book itself was changed later. I hope you can see my point. --[[User:AmritasyaPutra|<span style="color: #F4C430">AmritasyaPutra</span>✍]] 10:36, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

== Arbitration Committee sanctions ==

{{Ivm|2='''Please carefully read this information:'''

The Arbitration Committee has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding [[India]], [[Pakistan]], and [[Afghanistan]], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan|here]].

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[WP:INVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.
}}{{Z33}} [[User:Bladesmulti|Bladesmulti]] ([[User talk:Bladesmulti|talk]]) 02:04, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:04, 5 September 2014

Kautilya3, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Thank you for your prompt correction on Bal Gangadhar Tilak page

Hi Kautilya3, I think you got confused between the two of my edits. The edit you are talking about is different from the diff I provided in that section. Thank you for promptly updating the book edition. Regards. --AmritasyaPutra 11:40, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@AmritasyaPutra: Yes, I understand. However, I do mean it when I say you are being entirely negative. Can you do some research and find new material for Wikipedia, rather than merely nitpicking on other people's material? For instance, we don't yet have any information on Angana Chatterji's ISI connections. That should be of interest to you? Kautilya3 (talk) 12:15, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You seem to hate my edits! I have created new articles too! What's wrong in making corrections? --AmritasyaPutra 04:50, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing wrong with making corrections as long as your overall objective is to contribute knowledge to the world. But I see you focused almost exclusively on contesting other people's knowledge or writing. Kautilya3 (talk) 08:39, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That is your analysis. So, are you tracking my edits? --AmritasyaPutra 08:58, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@AmritasyaPutra: Of course I do. Wikipedia is a community, and we depend on trust. When I saw that you reverted edits within 10 minutes of noticing a page number issue, I checked your contributions and I see a pattern of such reverts. This is a big waste of time for everybody. Kautilya3 (talk) 09:20, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Despite our difference of opinion on the content at BGT page I appreciate your concern and efforts. Cheers! --AmritasyaPutra 10:34, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Btw, from my perspective, it was not 'page number issue': I had the given reference and I searched the entire book and did not find it. The edition of the book itself was changed later. I hope you can see my point. --AmritasyaPutra 10:36, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration Committee sanctions

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Template:Z33 Bladesmulti (talk) 02:04, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]