User talk:AmritasyaPutra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Govindudu Andarivadele[edit]

Hi. Long time! Hope you are doing well. The last time when we spoke to each other was about conducting the GAR of this article. After you cited lack of time, i rewrote it partially, got it c/ed by GOCE and updated it completely. It was nominated on 15 December 2014 and once, a vandal created the GAR page with very short content because of which it was deleted. At this stage, after waiting for months, i believe that you would either review the article soon or leave it for once and all, as i remember you saying that this article was in your mind. Please do confirm you intentions soon. Thank you. Hoping a positive response, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:07, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

I've seen that you are active since two days i posted this message and no reply till now. Hence i assume that you are not at all interested to take up a GAR of this article as you promised to do so. Sorry for troubling you. Regards, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:50, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
@Pavanjandhyala: I may not be able to spare time for a GA, I am very less active and studying two university courses along with work in real life. --AmritasyaPutraT 03:51, 6 April 2015 (UTC)


That's Polish name, original name of the defence company. English name is a translated form. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 08:05, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Okay, I will not revert again, you may mention in edit summary too. Since a valid English name was replaced with an apparent gibberish I had reverted. --AmritasyaPutraT 08:36, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Sanskrit copyedit[edit]

Hi there, I've been working on your copyediting request for the Sanskrit page. I'm not quite done yet, but I've run across a few issues that I've commented on in the talk page there; notably, the possibility of separating more clearly "historical" information from "modern usage," and a request for more information for the Phonology section (I think it should include a list of the language's phonemes). The work you've done on this page is great, and I'll keep working on the copyedit. In the meantime, if you could find some time to look into these things I'd appreciate it! — 2macia22 (talk) 04:56, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Oh, sure! Thank you so much! I am traveling soon and will not get back to a desktop until the coming Wednesday, Shreevatsa can help with the suggestions. --AmritasyaPutraT 05:11, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Can I help you all a bit to bring it up to GA? -The Heraldthe joy of the LORDmy strength 08:50, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Made some tweaks here and there. Best of luck. -The Heraldthe joy of the LORDmy strength 09:02, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration Case[edit]

The arbitration case Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/OccultZone_and_Others has been opened. For the arbitration committee, Robert McClenon (talk) 17:45, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/OccultZone and others. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/OccultZone and others/Evidence. Please add your evidence by May 15, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/OccultZone and others/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Robert McClenon (talk) 01:52, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Robert McClenon (talk) 01:52, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Female infanticide image[edit]

See my post to your talk page. Take it to Arbitration Enforcement. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:11, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Quarter Million Award[edit]

Million award logo.svg The Quarter Million Award
For your contributions to bring Heartbleed (estimated annual readership: 336,608) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Quarter Million Award. Congratulations, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! -- Bobnorwal (talk) 14:30, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Sorry it took so long! Bobnorwal (talk) 14:30, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Bobnorwal! :-) --AmritasyaPutraT 01:59, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ganapati Muni[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Ganapati Muni has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The page has no indication of notability; there are any number of religious leaders in south Asia, and the content does not demonstrate why this one deserves an article. The tone is also unencyclopedic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vanamonde93 (talk) 02:07, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Ayyala somayajulu ganapathi sastry for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ayyala somayajulu ganapathi sastry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayyala somayajulu ganapathi sastry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:16, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you![edit]

Wikipedia Library owl.svg

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

  • Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
  • Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
  • Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
  • Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
  • Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
  • Research coordinators: run reference services

Sign up now

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Perhaps, I will consider. --AmritasyaPutraT 18:39, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Happy friendship day[edit]

Happy friendship day --Tito Dutta (talk) 14:59, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. More trips in line, wiki presence may remain low. --AmritasyaPutraT 18:30, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Welcome back[edit]

Chocolate chip cookies.jpg Welcome back
Welcome back to Wikipedia. We've kept the cookies warm! -- Tito Dutta (talk) 20:27, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you Tito. Inviting some friends to share Satdeep Gill, Odisha1. Got lots of cookies! Need help connecting on Sanskrit Wikipedia, anyone who can help me learn typing easily? --AmritasyaPutraT 05:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks AmritasyaPutra. So, you need to learn typing for Sanskrit Wikipedia? Don't you use Google Input Tools ? --Satdeep Gill (talkcontribs 08:52, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
I use it sometimes. I used a commercial solution for sometime but it was not good enough, purchased and learnt INSCRIPT keyboard but I 'feel' I am still quite slow, would like first hand input from active editors. --AmritasyaPutraT 09:12, 6 September 2015 (UTC)


To see User:AmritasyaPutra/Temporary Notes. Not the start after being unblocked that I at least was hoping for. Doug Weller (talk) 09:38, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi Doug Weller on your response I have marked it for CSD. I did not try to make the note offline. Your (and others') Comments are always welcome. If you may see my point of view, I consider the block to be a genuine mistake which I have put in the past. --AmritasyaPutraT 17:27, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Welcome, and a suggestion[edit]

Welcome back; I hope we can get along better this time around. Considering the circumstances, and considering this decision, might I suggest getting rid of this? It makes it harder to assume good faith when that thing is still sitting in your user pages. Vanamonde93 (talk) 14:27, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. I appreciate your intention. You should know that I think I made good faith advances a number of times only to be baited by you. I survived you. I can recall having noted explicitly on wiki that I am steering clear of you. Yet I have continuously observed you assume bad faith consistently towards me in action like here or here. Nevertheless I can confidently guarantee if you make amends in action I will reciprocate appropriately. I have very short memory for disputes. You know me very well, I honor my words. (For example, in action a welcome is a welcome, a suggestion in same breath alleging that I assume bad faith, when I haven't even interacted with you, is actually an ironic reflection of your faith). And, this is written in good faith -- is a good start in my opinion. --AmritasyaPutraT 17:50, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
diff. I cure two doctored quotes and make minor improvements. Revert without talk page comment and cripple them again. --AmritasyaPutraT 03:01, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
one more agf in action by you?--AmritasyaPutraT 05:17, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

A beer for you![edit]

Export hell seidel steiner.png Hi, welcome back. -- Human3015TALK  14:44, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you. I don't exactly recall having interacted with you. How are you? I just finished hosting a dinner here at home. So 'am at leisure for a chat! --AmritasyaPutraT 17:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Your comment on my talk page.[edit]

Thank you for leaving the comment on my page. A you can see from Hirsi's talk page, I am already using her talk page frequently. I request you to also add any relevant responses on the talk page if you have anything specific to say or before undoing my edits. Remember we are trying to provide accurate and verifiable info to WP users.NiceAdam (talk) 00:06, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Brief question[edit]

Hi, I see that you've been unblocked after 3 months. I am curious, though, was this because you turned out not to be OccultZone, or are you starting over on this account? Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 05:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

No, I am not OccultZone. I have one (abandoned) account other than this one (AmritasyaPutra) having three edits. I have perhaps two or three edits as IP from a couple of years back. --AmritasyaPutraT 07:13, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on M. S. Golwalkar. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Same old aggression! Kautilya3 (talk) 13:53, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

WP:DTR --AmritasyaPutraT 03:07, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Talk page section. Your revert without participation in talk page and template a regular, is it in agf? --AmritasyaPutraT 05:40, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Well, things have improved here on Wikipedia while you were away. We don't any more do re-reverts until consensus is reached on the talk page. I think you need to get used to the new ways. Hence the template. - Kautilya3 (talk) 10:02, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Not clear, could you provide me the policy diff? --AmritasyaPutraT 10:16, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
It is same old policies. We just learnt how to practise them better. There is very little edit-warring going on on India pages right now. All that you need to know about policies are in the template above. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 18:21, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
  • WP:HYPOCRISY. You two should stop making thoughtless reverts. Talk page section. --AmritasyaPutraT 01:37, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Dear Kautilya3, I thought you wrote above "We don't any more do re-reverts until consensus is reached on the talk page." See diff m(. --AmritasyaPutraT 16:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Dear AP, "reverting" is returning to the status quo ante. "Re-reverting" is reinstating a contentious edit. - Kautilya3 (talk) 22:11, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
So you reverting a Re-revert is okay? I thought the rules are simple and apply to all: don't edit war. --AmritasyaPutraT 09:43, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles's 2015 GA Cup - Round 3[edit]

WikiProject Good Articles's 2015 GA Cup - Round 3
Symbol support vote.svg

Greetings, all! We hope that everyone had a nice summer.

Saturday saw the end of Round 2. Things went relatively smoothly this month. The top 2 from 4 pools, plus the top participant (the wildcard, or "9th place") of all remaining competitors, moved onto Round 3. We had one withdrawal early in Round 2, so he was replaced by the next-highest scorer from Round 1. Round 2's highest scorer was Pool D's Tomandjerry211, who earned an impressive 366 points; he also reviewed the most articles (19). Close behind was Zwerg Nase, also in Pool D, at 297 points and 16 articles. The wildcard slot went to Good888. Congrats to all!

Round 3 will have 9 competitors in 3 pools. The key to moving forward was reviewing articles with the longest nomination dates, as it has been in every round up to now. For example, 2 competitors only needed to review 2 articles each to win in their pools, and each article were either from the pink nomination box (20 points) or had languished in the queue for over 5 months (18 points). The GA Cup continues to be a success in many ways, even with fewer competitors this time. For some reason, the competitors in the 2015 GA Cup have reviewed fewer articles in Round 2, which has made the judges scratch their head in confusion. We've speculated many reasons for that: the summer months and vacations, our competitors are saving their strength for the final rounds, or they all live in the Pacific Northwest and the heavy wildfire smoke has affected their thinking. Whatever the reason, Round 2 competitors reviewed almost 100 articles, which is a significant impact in the task of reviewing articles for GA status. We've considered that the lower participation this competition is due to timing, so we intend to discuss the best time frame for future GA Cups.

For Round 3, participants have been placed randomly in 3 pools of 3 contestants each; the top editor in each pool will progress, as well as the top 2 of all remaining users. Round 3 will start on September 1 at 0:00:01 UTC and end on September 28 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Round 3 and the pools can be found here.

Good luck to the remaining contestants, and have fun!

Cheers from Figureskatingfan, 3family6 and Jaguar, and MrWooHoo.

To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

Delivered on behalf of WikiProject Good articles by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:26, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Project WIN[edit]

We are planning a project to improve WikiProject India (English Wikipedia). I'd appreciate if you kindly leave your feedback here --Tito Dutta (talk) 09:59, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

2nd Annual GA Cup - Round 4[edit]

WikiProject Good Articles's 2015 GA Cup - Round 4
Symbol support vote.svg

GA Cup competitors and observers: Happy Fall! Get ready, we're about to move into the finals of the second-ever GA Cup!

Monday saw the end of Round 3. Out of the 8 contestants in the semi-finals, 5 have moved to the finals. The semi-finals were competitive. Our semi-finalists reviewed a total of 61 articles, or a grand total of 1,151 points. If you were to lump the top winners from each of the three pools together, it'd be a close horse race; they were within 35 points of each other, which can only mean that the finals will be an exciting race. Tomandjerry211, our top scorer in Round 2, again earned the most points in the semi-finals, with 288 points and 16 articles reviewed. Johanna came in second overall, with 251 points and 13 articles reviewed; Sturmvogel 66 came in third overall, with 221 points and 16 articles. Rounding out our wildcard slots are Zwerg Nase and The Rambling Man. These contestants were very strategic in how they reviewed articles. Like every other round in the history of the GA Cup, success depended upon reviewing oldest-nominated articles. For example, Johanna reviewed 5 articles that were worth the highest possible points. Congrats to all our finalists, and good luck!

Stay tuned to this space for more information about the 2nd GA Cup, including overall statistics and how this competition has affected Wikipedia. We regret to inform you that Dom497, one of our original judges and co-creator of the GA Cup, has stepped down as a judge. Dom, a longtime member of WP:WikiProject Good articles, is responsible for the look of the GA Cup and has been instrumental in its upkeep. We wish him the best as he starts his university education, and are certain that he'll make an impact there as he has in Wikipedia.

The finals started on October 1 at 0:00:01 UTC and will end on Ocober 29 at 23:59:59 UTC with a winner being crowned. Information about the Final can be found here.

Cheers from Figureskatingfan, 3family6 and Jaguar, and MrWooHoo.

To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

Peer Review for Bharat Ratna[edit]

Hi. I have listed Bharat Ratna for peer review. Its currently a GA and I would like to take it FAC in the near future. You had conducted the GA review for the article so I would really appreciate if you could find some time and provide your comments here. Thanks in advance. - Vivvt (Talk) 13:35, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Please see article Hindu American Foundation[edit]

Please see article Hindu American FoundationVictoriaGraysonTalk 17:32, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

2015 GA Cup Wrap-Up[edit]

WikiProject Good Articles's 2015 GA Cup - Finals/Wrap-Up

Symbol support vote.svg

The second-ever GA Cup is now over! The competition officially ended Thursday. Congrats to everyone who participated, and especially to our finalists.

The winner of the 2nd GA Cup is Zwerg Nase! He earned 408 points, over 100 points more than he earned in all previous rounds. He tied with our second-place winner, Sturmvogel 66 with 367 points, in number of articles reviewed (24), and they earned almost the same points for reviewing articles that were in the queue the longest (Zwerg with 322, Sturmvogel with 326). Basically, they tied in points, but what made the different for Zwerg was the advantage he had in reviewing longer articles. It seems that the rule change of earning more realistic points for longer articles made a difference. All of our contestants should be proud of the work they were able to accomplish through the GA Cup. Congrats to these worthy opponents!

Our third and fourth place winners, Johanna and Tomandjerry211, also ran a close race, with 167 points and 147 points respectfully. We had one withdrawal; we found it interesting that competitors dropped out in Round 2 and 3 as well. One of the original judges and co-creator of this competition, User:Dom497 stepped down as judge during Round 3; as stated previously, we will miss his input and wish him the best.

The judges were pleased with our results, even though fewer users competed this time compared to our inaugural competition. We recognize that this might be due to holding the competition during the summer months. We intend on looking more closely when we should conduct this contest, as well as other aspects of the GA Cup. We've set up a feedback page for everyone's input about how we should conduct the contest and what rule changes should be made. If you have any ideas about how we can improve things, please visit it and give us your input.

Again, thanks to all and congratulations to our winners! Please stay tuned for the start of GA Cup #3.

Cheers from 3family6, Figureskatingfan, Jaguar and MrWooHoo.

Diwali Wishes[edit]

Feuerwerks-gif.gif Happy Diwali!!!

Sky full of fireworks,
Mouth full of sweets,
Home full of lamps,
And festival full of sweet memories...

Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous Diwali.
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:41, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Send Diwali wishings by adding {{subst:Happy Diwali}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.
Thank you! --AmritasyaPutraT 04:46, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Diwali greetings[edit]

Feuerwerks-gif.gif Happy Diwali!!!

Sky full of fireworks,
Mouth full of sweets,
Home full of lamps,
And festival full of sweet memories...

Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous Diwali.
-- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 07:09, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Send Diwali wishings by adding {{subst:Happy Diwali}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.


Hello, I have created my first WikiProject Proposal. It would be encouraging if you could have a look and comment on Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Narendra Modi. Thanks -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 11:13, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

You've got mail![edit]

Hello, AmritasyaPutra. Please check your email – you've got mail!
Message added 06:10, 27 November 2015 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

The Avengers 06:10, 27 November 2015 (UTC)