Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Seinfeld Chronicles/archive2: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎The Seinfeld Chronicles: image check - mostly OK (2 points to check, FUR?)
mNo edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:
*[[:File:Sein_ep101.jpg]] - could you elaborate on the "fair-use" rationale? Simply illustrating something usually isn't enough for "fair-use"; specifics and importance of the ''interior'' scene are never mentioned in the article. The scene also looks like a normal episode scene without any special or even iconic value (identification, critical commentary or iconic value would be among the most common of valid rationales).
*[[:File:Sein_ep101.jpg]] - could you elaborate on the "fair-use" rationale? Simply illustrating something usually isn't enough for "fair-use"; specifics and importance of the ''interior'' scene are never mentioned in the article. The scene also looks like a normal episode scene without any special or even iconic value (identification, critical commentary or iconic value would be among the most common of valid rationales).
*Other images are OK (CC) with source and author info, and no signs of Flickr-washing. [[User:GermanJoe|GermanJoe]] ([[User talk:GermanJoe|talk]]) 04:13, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
*Other images are OK (CC) with source and author info, and no signs of Flickr-washing. [[User:GermanJoe|GermanJoe]] ([[User talk:GermanJoe|talk]]) 04:13, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
**At the currnt moment I am unable to adress these issues but I'll fix them over the weekend ;).--[[User:Music2611|<span style="color:#CC5500;">'''Music'''</span>]][[User Talk:Music2611|<span style="color: #FF9912;">'''26/'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Music2611|<span style="color: #FF9912;">'''11'''</span>]] 13:11, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:11, 25 September 2014

The Seinfeld Chronicles (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator(s): --Music26/11 20:49, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Due to a lack of reviews (one review within a month, a 'cautious support'), this article was not promoted during the previous nomination. I hope this time around the article will receive more attention, as I believe it meets all standards for promotion.--Music26/11 20:49, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Quick comment: On the second and third paragraphs under the Reception section, the first mention of Ken Tucker is unlinked while the second one is linked while being described as The Philadelphia Inquirer critic. The first mention of Tucker should be linked with the description of Philadelphia Inquirer while the second mention should be unlinked without the description. Otherwise this article receives a Support from me.
--Birdienest81 (talk) 04:51, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image check - mostly OK (2 points, FUR?)

  • File:Jason_Alexander_Crop.png - all 3 source/author/permission links appear to be dead.
  • File:Sein_ep101.jpg - could you elaborate on the "fair-use" rationale? Simply illustrating something usually isn't enough for "fair-use"; specifics and importance of the interior scene are never mentioned in the article. The scene also looks like a normal episode scene without any special or even iconic value (identification, critical commentary or iconic value would be among the most common of valid rationales).
  • Other images are OK (CC) with source and author info, and no signs of Flickr-washing. GermanJoe (talk) 04:13, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]