Talk:Climate stabilization wedge: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:50, 7 October 2014

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Climate change.

Energy Unassessed

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

RE: Criticism

Have any actual economists weighed in? Connaughton and a utility engineer don't exactly seem like unbiased sources.

Light edits but more needed

I've done some minimal editing to reframe the "wedge game" as something a bit more serious - the concept is well regarded in academia and the original article by Pacala and Socolow has more than 2,000 citations. So it's more than just a game, it's also a valid approach to climate change mitigation. Still, I am not entirely happy with my edits, so more are welcome!Bksovacool (talk) 07:50, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 == RE: Criticism ==
 Have any actual economists weighed in? Connaughton and a utility engineer don't exactly seem like unbiased sources.
+== Light edits but more needed ==
+I've done some minimal editing to reframe the "wedge game" as something a bit more serious - the concept is well regarded in academia and the original article by Pacala and Socolow has more than 2,000 citations. So it's more than just a game, it's also a valid approach to climate change mitigation. Still, I am not entirely happy with my edits, so more are welcome![[User:Bksovacool|Bksovacool]] ([[User talk:Bksovacool|talk]]) 07:50, 7 October 2014 (UTC)