Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Roco (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 01:04, 14 October 2014

John Roco

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was going to remove the bad sources, but then I realized that if I removed the agenda-based sources that lack editorial oversight/fact-checking, the sources affiliated with the subject, etc., there just wasn't anything left, basically. Dude isn't notable, never even got out of his party's primary. Not a GNG/BIO pass. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 16:05, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable BLP. being cousin of a "the late Philippine Senator" is not notable. running for US senate and not-winning your own party's primary vote is not notable. being a hots/producer on public access tv is not notable.Cramyourspam (talk) 19:19, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 17:21, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Upgrading to Strong Delete since this article was already deleted once AND in that debate, there was an AUTOBIOGRAPHY confession "I ...typed the entry, John Roco ....I made it. I tried remove all unbiased parts, but is hard when you are actually John Roco so please jury", said User:John Roco. Elsewhere appears this: " I am John Roco and was recently deleted.... yes, I did the 'John Roco' article" said User:John Roco. since the User:John Roco account has been inactive since 2010, i believe the new article is the work of a WP:SOCK.Cramyourspam (talk) 19:19, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- This seems probable since the creator's only contributions are making this article and linking/talking about Roco in other articles. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:48, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing notable here. The advocacy organization he founded has already been deleted as non-notable, and his political endeavors fell far short of notability. --MelanieN (talk) 01:19, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Roscelese nominated the page for deletion because of her bias against Roco and opposition to religious freedom. Ywreuv (talk) 01:04, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Hawaii|list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC)</small>
 *'''Delete''' Nothing notable here. The advocacy organization he founded has already been deleted as non-notable, and his political endeavors fell far short of notability. --[[User:MelanieN|MelanieN]] ([[User talk:MelanieN|talk]]) 01:19, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' Roscelese nominated the page for deletion because of her bias against Roco and opposition to religious freedom. [[User:Ywreuv|Ywreuv]] ([[User talk:Ywreuv|talk]]) 01:04, 14 October 2014 (UTC)