Jump to content

Devastation-class ironclad: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cleaning up accepted Articles for creation submission (afch-rewrite 0.8)
tag for merge
Line 1: Line 1:
{{mergeto|Devastation-class ironclad|discuss=Talk:Devastation-class ironclad#Merger proposal|date=October 2014}}
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Devastation''-''Thunderer'' Turret Ship}}
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Devastation''-''Thunderer'' Turret Ship}}
{{for|the French ironclads with a similar name|Dévastation class ironclad}}
{{for|the French ironclads with a similar name|Dévastation class ironclad}}

Revision as of 16:13, 16 October 2014

HMS Devastation
HMS Devastation in 1896
Class overview
Builderslist error: <br /> list (help)
HM Royal Dockyard, Portsmouth
HM Royal Dockyard, Pembroke
Operators
Royal Navy
Succeeded by
HMS Dreadnought..[3]
Costlist error: <br /> list (help)
Devastation - £354,000[1]
Thunderer - £358,500[2]
Built
1869–1877[3]
In service
1874 to 1905
Planned
2
Completed
2
Lost
0
Retired
2
General characteristics [4]
Displacement9,330 t (9,183 long tons)
Lengthlist error: <br /> list (help)
307 ft (94 m) oa
285 ft (87 m) pp
Beam62 ft 3 in (18.97 m)
Draught26 ft 8 in (8.13 m)
Propulsionlist error: <br /> list (help)
As built: Devastation 2 x Penn 2-cyl trunk direct-acting steam engines turning 2 screws[5]
2 x Humphry's 2-cyl trunk direct-acting steam engines turning 2 screws[6]
8 x rectangular boilers
1890/92 Rebuild: 2 x Maudslay 3-cyl VTE steam engines turning 2 screws
8 x cylindrical locomotive type boilers
Speedlist error: <br /> list (help)
As built:[10] 6,640 ihp (4,950 kW) ND / 13.84 kn (25.63 km/h; 15.93 mph)
1890/92 Rebuild: 7,000 ihp (5,200 kW) ND / 14 kn (26 km/h; 16 mph)
Rangelist error: <br /> list (help)
1,800 tons of coal
5,980 nautical miles @ 10 knots
Endurance12 days with steam for full speed[7]
Complement410
Armamentlist error: <br /> list (help)
As built: Devastation
4 × 12 inch RML of 35 tons Mk I naval gun on sliding carriages[8]
Thunderer
2 x 12.5 inch RML of 38 tons Mk I or II naval gun on sliding carriages
2 × 12 inch RML of 35 tons Mk I naval gun on sliding carriages[9]
1890/92 Rebuild:
4 × 10-inch 32 calibre (25.4 cm) breach loading (BL) naval guns mounted in twin Mark II Turrets
6 × 6-pounder 8 hundredweight (cwt) [2.244” 40 calibre (57 mm)] quick fire (QF) Mark I naval gun on Mark I* low angle single mounts
8 × Hotchkiss 3-pounder (1.4 kg) (1.85" 40 calibre (47 mm)) QF Mark I naval gun on twelve single Mark I* low angle mounts
5-7 x Nordenfelt multi-barrel guns on pedestal mounts
2 x Gardiner light machineguns
2 x Whitehead 14-inch (36 cm)torpedo tubes (fixed below waterline)
Armourlist error: <br /> list (help)
Type: wrought iron with teak or oak backing
Sides: 12 and 10 in (300 and 250 mm)
Breastwork: 12 and 10 in (300 and 250 mm)
Turrets: 14 and 12 in (360 and 300 mm)
Backing: 16–18 inches (410–460 mm) teak or oak
Deck: 3 and 2 in (76 and 51 mm)

The Devastation Turret Class warship was designed in 1868 by Sir Edward J. Reed. The Reed concept was to produce short, handy ships of medium size as heavily armed as possible with a good turn of speed. His concept also included warships that could attack and destroy an opponent without much risk in being damaged during the process[11]. During his studies of the American low freeboard monitors, he developed his idea which he called the breastwork monitor[12]. The First Lord of the Admiralty, Admiral Sir Hugh Childers and Admiral Sir Robert Spencer Robinson (Comptroller of the Royal Navy) in discussions with the Chief Constructor of the Royal Navy, Sir Edward Reed of the need for a large breastwork monitor capable of steaming from Queenstown (now Cobh, Ireland) on the south-east coast of Ireland to Halifax, Nova Scotia on the east coast of Canada[13].

HMS Devastation and a second vessel (HMS Thunderer) were ordered for the Royal Navy under the 1869 – 1870 Naval Estimates. A third vessel (HMS Fury) would be ordered the following year to a modified design[9]. The vessels were assailed in the British Press as absolute failures even before either were launched[8]. From their commissioning to 1888 they were the most formidable British battleships in the Royal Navy[14].

Design and Development

Right elevation and deck plan as depicted in Brassey's Naval Annual 1888

The Admiralty Design Board set forth the requirements for the ocean going monitors. These included the requirement of two twin 12-inch gun turrets capable of firing 600-pound shells with a 280 degree firing arc. The turrets would require 14-inch armour protection with the machinery spaces and shell rooms protected by 12-inch thick armour. Further, to reduce the interference with the main guns no masts or sails were needed. The ships would need two steam engines for security and a minimum 12-knot speed. The trans- Atlantic concept was changed to a coastal defence ship so a very low freeboard of 4 feet 6 inches (1.37 metres) was specified.

The loss of HMS Captain in September 1871 led to concerns about the stability of turret ships, and a special committee was set up to determine the safety of turret ships. Changes to the design were recommended[14]. The freeboard of the design was increased to 10 feet 9 inches (3.28 metres)[5]. Another change was to extend the armoured breastwork with unarmoured structure to the sides of the ship and carried aft to improve the stability at large angles of heel. This greatly improved the crew comfort by adding extra accommodation and especially latrines, but since it was not armoured would have been riddled in a battle reducing the stability of the vessel[15].

In 1871 a 9-foot (2.7 m) long model of Devastation was tested in a water tank, and subsequently with an 18-foot (5.5 m) long version. Once Devastation was completed, tests could be carried out with the real ship. This included building up a roll of 7 degrees by having 400 men run back and forth across the deck 18 times. Other tests involved taking it to sea to look for rough weather, in one trial waves of 20-26 feet (6-8 m) were encountered which gave the ship a 14 degree roll either way[15].

In 1872 the armour protection of the turret was subjected to a series of tests. A replica of the proposed turret was constructed and tested at Shoeburyness in May 1872. The 11-inch (280 mm) armour plate backed by 15 inches (380 mm) of teak and a 1.25-inch (32 mm) metal skin resisted hits from a 25 ton 12-inch gun firing at a range of 200 yards (180 m), although one shot hit a joint between plates and opened a gap 7 inches (180 mm) wide but did not penetrate[16]. A second test involved HMS Hotspur firing three shots at the turret of HMS Glatton from a 25 ton gun at a range of 200 yards. The first shot missed, however the the second and third shot struck the turret. The turret was not apreciably damaged, though theorectically it should have been penetrated[17].

Construction and Specifications

Both vessels were laid down in 1869 at Portsmouth and at Pembroke. The Portsmouth ship was launched in 1870. Construction on the Pembroke ship was suspended following the loss of HMS Captain and not launched until 1872[3]. They were 285 ft (87 m) in length between the perpendiculars with an overall length of 307 ft (94 m). They had a beam of 62 ft 3 in (18.97 m) and a maximum draught of 26 ft 8 in (8.13 m)[3]. They displaced 9,330 t (9,183 long tons). HMS Devastation was completed in 1873 and after a series of stability tests, HMS Thunderer was not completed until 1877 awaiting stability tests on HMS Devastation and a boiler explosion in 1876[4].

The machinery was initially supplied by Penn[5] for the Portsmouth ship and Humphry’s, Tennant & Company of Depford for the Pembroke ship. The ships were equipped with eight rectangular boilers powering two 2-cylinder trunk direct acting steam engines turning two shafts producing 6,650 indicated horsepower (IHP) under a natural draught (ND) for a designed speed of 13.75 knots[10]. The ships carried 1,800 tons of coal giving a cruising range of 5,980 nautical miles at a nominal speed of 10 knots[4]. They could remain at sea for approximately 12 days with fuel available to steam at full speed for a short duration[7].

HMS Devastation shipped four 12 inch rifled muzzel loading (RML) of 35 tons Mark I naval guns on sliding carriages and HMS Thunderer shipped two 12.5 inch RML of 38 tons Mark I or II naval guns (fore turret) and two 12 inch rifled muzzel loading (RML) of 35 tons Mark I naval guns on sliding carriages (aft turret)[8]. The guns were housed in two round turrets shipped fore and aft on the centerline. The guns would be reloaded under the cover of the turret thereby not exposing the gun crew to enemy fire. To load the guns the guns would be trained to approximately 140 degrees on either side of the centerline then moved to the end of their recoil. The muzzles would be lowered towards the deck the shell and powder track would be raised from the deck below. On HMS Devastation they would be manually raised whereas on HMS Thunderer they would be raised hydraulically. A rammer would ram first the powder then the shell into the gun. The gun then would be raise and moved to the firing position. The angle of the guns during reloading would be at an angle that in the event of a premature firing, the shell would exit the hull above the waterline rather than below it. No secondary armament or anti-torpedo boat armament was fitted. In 1879 she was fitted with two Whitehead 14-inch (36 cm) torpedo tubes in fixed mounts one per broadside below the waterline.

For armour protection the ships were provided with wrought iron plating backed with 18 to 19 inches of teak. The sides of the breastwork were plated with 14 inches of armour[4]. This armour extended below the waterline. It was pierced with square portholes to provide ventilation for the crew spaces[3]. The turrets were protected with 14 inches of plate armour on the front and 12 inches on the sides and rear[4]. Ships built previous to the HMS Devastation only had deck armour as part of the structure. HMS Devastation and the ships that followed her were given increasing weight of desk armour[18]. The armoured deck was 3 inches tapering to 2 inches at the lower edge. The armour plating only applied to the breastwork portion of the ship and the bow and stern sections were basically unprotected[3][4].

1890/92 Reconstruction

After the investigation into the boiler explosion on HMS Thunderer revealed the hazards of the rectangular boilers, they were ‘taken in hand’ for a boiler upgrade and armament change in 1890. Their replacement machinery was supplied by Maudslay, Son & Field of Lambeth. The ships had their boilers replaced with eight cylindrical locomotive type boilers powering two Maudslay 3-cylinder vertical triple expansion (VTE) steam engines turning 2 shafts producing 7,000 IHP under a forced draught (FD) for an increase in speed to 14 knots[4]. The 35 and 38 ton MLRs were replaced with four 10-inch 32 calibre (25.4 cm) breach loading (BL) naval guns mounted in twin Mark II Turrets[4]. With the advent of torpedo boats, a secondary armament was fitted consisting of six 6-pounder 8 hundredweight (cwt) [2.244” 40 calibre (57 mm)] quick fire (QF) Mark I naval guns on Mark I* low angle single mounts and twelve Hotchkiss 3-pounder (1.4 kg) (1.85" 40 calibre (47 mm)) QF Mark I naval gun on single Mark I* low angle mounts. Seven (Devastation) and five (Thunderer) Nordenfelt 1-inch multi-barrel guns were installed on single pedestal mounts was also fitted and she carried two Gardener light machine guns[4]

Service and Disposition

The ships originally conceived as ocean going breastwork monitors were redesignated as 2nd Class Turret ships in 1886 and finally as 2nd Class Battleships by the 1900s[19]. Both ships served in Home Waters and the Mediterranean during their careers. The concept of the ships was openly assailed by the British press and cost Sir Edward Reed his position as Chief Constructor[8]. However, the ships were excellent sea boats and well thought of by their crews[10]. Both were modernized in 1891 and spent the next ten years as guard ships or in reserve being activated only for the annual summer maneuvers. Their age (Devastation was 32 years and Thunderer was 28 years in service) condemned them to being removed from the effective list in 1905. HMS Devastation went to the breakers in 1908 followed by HMS Thunderer in 1909. As the first major British warships built without sails thereby relying solely on steam power they were the start of modern British battleship design[20]

Notes

All ships specifications are from the 'Illustrated Guide to the Royal Navy and Foreign Navies' unless otherwise noted.

Ship Class name - These vessels are listed on the March 1901 (Monthly) Navy List as Twin Screw Battle Ship, 2nd Class Armoured. No other class designation has been found on the Royal Navy Lists. Jane's Fighting Ships of 1898 lists no class name. Only Conways Fighting Ships (as seen by this author) published in 1979 lists them as the Devastation Class.

References

  1. ^ Illustrated Guide to the Royal Navy and Foreign Navies, 1896, page 14
  2. ^ Illustrated Guide to the Royal Navy and Foreign Navies, 1896, page 20
  3. ^ a b c d e f The British Battle Fleet, Volume I, 1915, page 312 to 317 Cite error: The named reference "The British Battle Fleet" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i Illustrated Guide to the Royal Navy and Foreign Navies, 1896, page 14 and 20
  5. ^ a b c Report of Chief Engineer J.W. King, USN, 1887, page 37 to 45 Cite error: The named reference "King, James Wilson" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  6. ^ The British Battle Fleet, Volume I, 1915, page 317
  7. ^ a b Jane's Fighting Ships, 1898, Table on page 209 (Devastation & Thunderer) Cite error: The named reference "Jane’s, 1898 p209" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  8. ^ a b c d The British Battle Fleet, Volume I, 1915, page 312 Cite error: The named reference "The British Battle Fleet p312" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  9. ^ a b The British Battle Fleet, Volume I, 1915, page 317
  10. ^ a b c The British Battle Fleet, Volume I, 1915, page 315 Cite error: The named reference "The British Battle Fleet p315" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  11. ^ The British Battle Fleet, Volume I, 1915, page 264
  12. ^ The British Battle Fleet, Volume I, 1915, page 292
  13. ^ Modern Ships of War 1888, page 25
  14. ^ a b Modern Ships of War, 1888, page 15
  15. ^ a b Brown 2003, page 61
  16. ^ Brown 2003, page 60
  17. ^ The British Battle Fleet, Volume I, 1915, page 320
  18. ^ Modern Ships of War, 1888, page 2
  19. ^ The British Navy – Past and Present, 1904, page 99
  20. ^ The British Battle Fleet, Volume I, 1915, page 316
  • Jane’s All The Worlds Fighting Ships 1898, first published by Sampson Low Marston 1898, Republished by David and Charles (Publishers), 1969, 7153 4476 5
  • The British Battle Fleet – Its Inception and Growth Through the Ages to the Present Day, Volume I, Fred T. Jane, The Library Press, London 1915
  • Illustrated Guide to the Royal Navy and Foreign Navies, Fred T.W. Gibbs, 2nd Edition edited and revised by E.W.C. Gibbs, Waterlow Brothers & Layton Ltd, London – 1896
  • Modern Ships of War, Sir Edward J. Reed, M.P., Edward Simpson, Rear-Adm (USN), J.D. Gerrold Kelley, Lt (USN), Harper & Brothers, Franklin Square, New York, 1888
  • The British Navy – Past and Present, Rear-Admiral S. Eardly-Wilmont, Second Edition 1904, The Navy League, London
  • The British Fleet – The Growth, Achievements and Duties of the Navy of the Empire, by Commander Charles N. Robinson, RN, 1894, London
  • King, James Wilson (1887), Report of Chief Engineer J.W. King, USN, on European ships of war and their armament, naval administration and economy, marine constructions and appliances, dockyards, etc., etc. (http://archive.org/details/cu31924005009638). Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office
  • Brown, David. Warrior to Dreadnought: Warship development 1860–1905, Chatham Publishing.
  • Chesneau, Roger and Eugene M. Kolesnik. Conway's All The World's Fighting Ships 1860–1905. London: Conway Maritime Press, 1979. ISBN 0-85177-133-5.

External links

1891 rebuild armament nomenclature from:
1. 10-inch url: http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNBR_10-32_mk1-4.htm
2. 6-pdr url: http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNBR_6pounder_m1.htm
3. 3-pdr QF url: http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNBR_3pounder_V_mk1.htm