Talk:List of English translations of De rerum natura: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Name: some examples for lower case titles. |
m assess |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell |1= |
{{WikiProjectBannerShell |1= |
||
{{WikiProject Philosophy |class=list |importance= |ancient=yes |literature=yes |metaphysics=yes |mind=yes}} |
{{WikiProject Philosophy |class=list |importance=low |ancient=yes |literature=yes |metaphysics=yes |mind=yes}} |
||
{{WikiProject Poetry|class=list |importance= }} |
{{WikiProject Poetry|class=list |importance= }} |
||
{{WikiProject History of Science |class=list |importance= }} |
{{WikiProject History of Science |class=list |importance= }} |
Revision as of 04:43, 7 November 2014
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name
As the Wikipedia article on Lucretius' work is named De rerum natura (lower case), shouldn't this article also be calledd List of English translations of De rerum natura?
PS: I think this list ought to be in Category:Literature lists. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:06, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for noticing my new little article. Category is added. As to caps, I did notice the discrepancy, but assumed that the lowercase version was in error. De Rerum Natura is after all the proper name of a book. A quick search on Amazon reveals that most (though not all) instances capitalize each word. I'm certainly open to the change, but at this point it seems to me that the list is right and the main article is wrong. Is there a special Latin literature naming convention I'm missing? Phil wink (talk) 15:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- Wikipedia convention, in line with The Chicago Manual of Style, is to capitalise only proper names for all Latin-language works, eg Commentarii de Bello Gallico and Libri Carolini, but De architectura, De re publica, Ars grammatica, or, from more recent times, De analysi per aequationes numero terminorum infinitas. As can be expected, this convention is not fully implemented, and there are plenty of inconsistencies, eg Ars amatoria which uses Ars Amatoria as the page title but the lower case variant as the bolded headword. The WikiProject Opera has a similar convention: La traviata, La bohème, La voix humaine, or in this context, Oedipus rex and Sub olea pacis et palma virtutis. Similar rules are used at Wikipedia:WikiProject Classical music/Guidelines#Capitalization: original language titles. Hope this helps. Cheers, Michael Bednarek (talk) 06:37, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Categories:
- List-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- List-Class philosophical literature articles
- Low-importance philosophical literature articles
- Philosophical literature task force articles
- List-Class metaphysics articles
- Low-importance metaphysics articles
- Metaphysics task force articles
- List-Class philosophy of mind articles
- Low-importance philosophy of mind articles
- Philosophy of mind task force articles
- List-Class Ancient philosophy articles
- Low-importance Ancient philosophy articles
- Ancient philosophy task force articles
- List-Class Poetry articles
- Unknown-importance Poetry articles
- WikiProject Poetry articles
- List-Class history of science articles
- Unknown-importance history of science articles
- WikiProject History of Science articles
- List-Class Latin articles
- Unknown-importance Latin articles