Talk:List of aircraft losses during the Russo-Ukrainian War: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:40, 16 November 2014

Ukraine List‑class Mid‑importance

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I used [List of Soviet aircraft losses in the Soviet war in Afghanistan] as a template. However, it could be discussed if this page should include all aircraft losses (Noteable the MH17, and perhaps future Russian/other parties losses) or strictly be for Ukraine.

Need help with adjusting the references. GranQ (talk) 09:50, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To update the info

I recommend this link:

http://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/dblist.php?Year=2014&page=28

Some of the Ukranian loses are not included still. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.13.209.183 (talk) 07:28, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

UAV

I think this downed Tupolev UAV should be included. http://rt.com/news/177472-ukraine-soviet-drone-down/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.47.107.247 (talk) 00:31, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Right now the consensus on War in Donbass is that RussiaToday (among other sources) are not reliable sources for these matters. As a personal opinion, the militants may very well have taken the UAV out of storage and smashed it a bit, as it looks quite fine to have fallen from the air. Oscar-HaP (talk) 09:09, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

it does not matter if militants took it out of storage, once it belonged to ukrainian army, now they cant use it anymore, so it is their loss. And if you don't believe RT, you could believe video in the article which is very clear. --31.47.107.247 (talk) 23:01, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aircraft origin

The columns look crammed even on a widescreen, and I don't see how stating in a column the aircraft origin brings anything meaningful to the topic of the article, which is a list of aircraft losses and not an inventory of the Ukrainian Air Force. Removing the column would make easier to look at the important info of the table. Oscar-HaP (talk) 09:00, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tarasovka airfield incident

What about this incident? http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20140717-1 http://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=168012 http://nakarte.lg.ua/blog/proisshestvija/pod-luganskom-obstreljali-ayerodrom-v-veseloi-tarasovke-foto.html

Title

The title "2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine" reads as an obvious euphemism. It is also excessively long. What about changing it to "2014 Russian intervention in Ukraine".