User talk:Roger Davies: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Roger Davies/Archive 2014) (bot |
→Arbcom gender case COI?: new section |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
About renaming the GGTF case: I would name it GGTF, as an abbreviation that doesn't spell out the term gender gap. Will the infoboxes case perhaps also be renamed, because it wasn't about infoboxes? I learned it eventually but too late ;) - I received [[User:Gerda Arendt/ACE 2014|interesting answers]] to my questions to the candidates, but the question about the "spirit of the restrictions" is still open. Whatever the spirit, the restriction to two comments per discussion is wise and should be applied more generously. Imagine the PD talk in the GGTF case under that restriction for everybody! --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 08:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC) |
About renaming the GGTF case: I would name it GGTF, as an abbreviation that doesn't spell out the term gender gap. Will the infoboxes case perhaps also be renamed, because it wasn't about infoboxes? I learned it eventually but too late ;) - I received [[User:Gerda Arendt/ACE 2014|interesting answers]] to my questions to the candidates, but the question about the "spirit of the restrictions" is still open. Whatever the spirit, the restriction to two comments per discussion is wise and should be applied more generously. Imagine the PD talk in the GGTF case under that restriction for everybody! --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 08:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC) |
||
== Arbcom gender case COI? == |
|||
Mr. Davies, |
|||
You may wish to review the new evidence just presented by arbitrator Salvio to see whether you might have a COI. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gender_Gap_Task_Force/Proposed_decision&diff=635631572&oldid=635623282] |
|||
Regards, |
|||
—[[User:Neotarf|Neotarf]] ([[User talk:Neotarf|talk]]) 04:19, 28 November 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:19, 28 November 2014
If you post a message on this page, I'll reply here to avoid fragmenting the discussion. So add it to your watchlist.
If I leave you a message on your talk page, it will be added to my watchlist. So feel free to reply to it there instead of here.
Please sign and date your message by typing four tildes (~~~~)<br /
Case names
About renaming the GGTF case: I would name it GGTF, as an abbreviation that doesn't spell out the term gender gap. Will the infoboxes case perhaps also be renamed, because it wasn't about infoboxes? I learned it eventually but too late ;) - I received interesting answers to my questions to the candidates, but the question about the "spirit of the restrictions" is still open. Whatever the spirit, the restriction to two comments per discussion is wise and should be applied more generously. Imagine the PD talk in the GGTF case under that restriction for everybody! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Arbcom gender case COI?
Mr. Davies,
You may wish to review the new evidence just presented by arbitrator Salvio to see whether you might have a COI. [1]
Regards,