Jump to content

User talk:Metamagician3000: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 37: Line 37:
Yes I have. You can safely delete it, but if somehow Victoria Azarenka does return to form in 2015 (something I doubt given her injury woes in 2015) then I can reinstate it. [[User:MasterMind5991|MasterMind5991]] ([[User talk:MasterMind5991|talk]]) 12:22, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Yes I have. You can safely delete it, but if somehow Victoria Azarenka does return to form in 2015 (something I doubt given her injury woes in 2015) then I can reinstate it. [[User:MasterMind5991|MasterMind5991]] ([[User talk:MasterMind5991|talk]]) 12:22, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
:Thanks! [[User:Metamagician3000|Metamagician3000]] ([[User talk:Metamagician3000#top|talk]]) 12:25, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
:Thanks! [[User:Metamagician3000|Metamagician3000]] ([[User talk:Metamagician3000#top|talk]]) 12:25, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

== Talk: Cultural Marxim, deleted comments ==
I believe you've deleted some of my comments during your archiving of [[talk:Cultural Marxism]]. This is against Wikipedia policy, so please fix this questionable error immediately. --[[Special:Contributions/60.241.86.130|60.241.86.130]] ([[User talk:60.241.86.130|talk]]) 06:21, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:21, 23 December 2014

Everything to date now archived

Good to have that done! Metamagician3000 (talk) 05:31, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ross University School of Medicine

I'm not sure if this is a canvassing violation, but I'd sure appreciate it if you could voice your opinion / kick in over at the title article. All of my relatively conservative edits to reduce the NPOV problem have been summarily reverted by an IP editor, and the WP:SPA editor who brought the request for protection seems very resistant to making any substantative changes as well.

I hate to see this kind of thing on Wikipedia. But the subject of this article is outside my usual interests, and given the determined opposition, getting this article to a point where it is not an embarrassment is likely to be a lot more work to do on my own than I really want to commit to. Having a second voice would be appreciated if the rules permit this request. Formerly 98 (talk) 13:42, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have another look at it tomorrow. It's outside my usual interests as well, though I do know a bit about universities in a general way. Maybe I can at least make a supportive note on the article's talk page. I don't see this as canvassing in any forbidden way, especially given where the discussion started. Metamagician3000 (talk) 15:03, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Xanth?

I find your username amusing. Did you derive it from Piers Anthony's Xanth books? I'm particularly interested because I suggested the term "metamagic" and its definition to him in a fan letter. (Acknowledgements, Question Quest.) --Thnidu (talk) 18:37, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, afraid not. One source was the 1985 Douglas Hofstadter book, Metamagical Themas - but more in the foreground at the time was someone else's discussion of metamagical thinking that I'd read. I think it might have been something by Robert Sapolsky, but it's quite a while ago now. I really should go back and check... Metamagician3000 (talk) 05:40, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And a further check of my shelves finds that the relevant discussion was, indeed, by Sapolsky. It's in his book Junk Food Monkeys, also published as The Trouble with Testosterone. I just left a note on the talk page for the Sapolsky article that these seem to be two names for (different editions of) the same book. Metamagician3000 (talk) 06:25, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Metamagician3000! Just a FYI, it looks like you commented with a !vote twice in this AfD, see [1] and [2]. LFaraone 22:39, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that - it wasn't meant to be two !votes. I've never been sure whether we're supposed to confirm/update positions from before a case being relisted. Metamagician3000 (talk) 00:21, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2015 Azarenka page

Yes I have. You can safely delete it, but if somehow Victoria Azarenka does return to form in 2015 (something I doubt given her injury woes in 2015) then I can reinstate it. MasterMind5991 (talk) 12:22, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Metamagician3000 (talk) 12:25, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk: Cultural Marxim, deleted comments

I believe you've deleted some of my comments during your archiving of talk:Cultural Marxism. This is against Wikipedia policy, so please fix this questionable error immediately. --60.241.86.130 (talk) 06:21, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]