Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan S. Hill: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::'''Comment''' I am a film historian and feel this Nathan Hill has made a couple notable films. |
::'''Comment''' I am a film historian and feel this Nathan Hill has made a couple notable films. |
||
::'''Comment''' Please explain why a filmmaker of home videos is listed as "Nathan Hill" the filmmaker not the real Nathan Hill? |
::'''Comment''' Please explain why a filmmaker of home videos is listed as "Nathan Hill" the filmmaker not the real Nathan Hill? |
||
::'''Comment''' Is Rotten Tomatoes an Independent source? |
Revision as of 00:14, 10 February 2015
- Nathan S. Hill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable per WP:CREATIVE, no independent refs given, non found, possible COI/PR creator Deunanknute (talk) 23:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
- Comment-I was unsure of this but he did look notable at the time but now I'm unsure what to say. Wgolf (talk) 23:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
- Comment-He is more notable than the Australian director of same name — Preceding unsigned comment added by PRose88 (talk • contribs) 23:52, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
http://www.searchmytrash.com/cgi-bin/creditsb.pl?mancallednereus%282012%29notability is not determined by other articles, please see WP:WHATABOUTX. Also, see WP:RS and WP:IS for information on reliable and independent sources, respectively. Deunanknute (talk) 00:06, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I am a film historian and feel this Nathan Hill has made a couple notable films.
- Comment Please explain why a filmmaker of home videos is listed as "Nathan Hill" the filmmaker not the real Nathan Hill?
- Comment Is Rotten Tomatoes an Independent source?