User talk:Arjunkrishna90: Difference between revisions
←Blanked the page |
Jayakumar RG (talk | contribs) Undid revision 645154576 by Arjunkrishna90 (talk) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Because you thanked me == |
|||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Echo thanks.svg|60px]] |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Arjunkrishna90, you thanked me for one of my recent edits, so here is a heart-felt...<br />{{pad|6em}}'''''<big>Y</big>OU'RE <big>W</big>ELCOME!</big>'''''<br />It's a pleasure, and I hope you have a lot of fun while you edit this inspiring encyclopedia phenomenon! [[User:Mattwheatley|Mattwheatley]] ([[User talk:Mattwheatley|talk]]) |
|||
|} |
|||
04:12, 13 January 2015 (UTC)<!-- This is Template:Because you thanked me – shortcut = {{subst:ytm}} --> |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Munna55|Munna55]]. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of [[Special:Contributions/Arjunkrishna90|your recent contributions]] to [[:Ashwatthaman]] because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[WP:sandbox|sandbox]]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Munna55|my talk page]]. Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 -->. I remove only the unreferenced text and the ones that I could not find a proof for. I see that you delete the referenced texts I add (mostly from Ganguli's Translation of Mahabharat. Please check the links I provide before deleting. ([[User talk:munna55|talk]]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned"> — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 04:32, 13 January 2015 (UTC)</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== January 2015 == |
|||
<div style=clear: both></div>[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to [[:Ashwatthama]] with <span class="plainlinks">[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ashwatthama&diff=642262295 this edit]</span>, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. Please make use of the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. [[User:Jim1138|Jim1138]] ([[User talk:Jim1138|talk]]) 05:15, 13 January 2015 (UTC)<!-- Template:Huggle/warn-delete-2 --><!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> |
|||
==Edit warring notification== |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Ashwatthama]]. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus-building in talk pages|collaborate]] with others, to avoid editing [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptively]], and to [[Wikipedia:Consensus|try to reach a consensus]] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> |
|||
Please be particularly aware that [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|Wikipedia's policy on edit warring]] states: |
|||
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''. |
|||
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' |
|||
In particular, editors should be aware of the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, '''breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|block]]'''. |
|||
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. <!-- Template:uw-ew --> [[User:Jim1138|Jim1138]] ([[User talk:Jim1138|talk]]) 05:32, 13 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 09:35, 10 February 2015
Because you thanked me
|
Arjunkrishna90, you thanked me for one of my recent edits, so here is a heart-felt... YOU'RE WELCOME! It's a pleasure, and I hope you have a lot of fun while you edit this inspiring encyclopedia phenomenon! Mattwheatley (talk) |
04:12, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Munna55. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Ashwatthaman because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!. I remove only the unreferenced text and the ones that I could not find a proof for. I see that you delete the referenced texts I add (mostly from Ganguli's Translation of Mahabharat. Please check the links I provide before deleting. (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 04:32, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
January 2015
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ashwatthama with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 05:15, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Edit warring notification
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ashwatthama. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Jim1138 (talk) 05:32, 13 January 2015 (UTC)