Talk:M61 motorway: Difference between revisions
Magioladitis (talk | contribs) m clean up using AWB (8413) |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Worsley Braided Interchange== |
== Worsley Braided Interchange== |
||
Google maps link deleted by "John" on 01 January 2012 restored, this is a useful image of what has been described in over 100 words, and needs to be inserted as an external link due to the fact that Google imagery is copyright and therefore cannot be inserted as a picture. Thanks for all your good work tidying up the copy in this and other motorway articles, but if deleting someone's contribution outright it would be good to know the reason why on the talk section rather than just finding it gone and having to search the edit history. My opinion is that a direct link is more user-friendly, however if the consensus is that a Google Maps link is not appropriate then I would be happy for it to be replaced by long/lat coordinates so that any map engine can be used. [[User:Baldy Bill|Baldy Bill]] ([[User talk:Baldy Bill|talk]]) 10:40, 2 January 2012 (UTC) |
Google maps link deleted by "John" on 01 January 2012 restored, this is a useful image of what has been described in over 100 words, and needs to be inserted as an external link due to the fact that Google imagery is copyright and therefore cannot be inserted as a picture. Thanks for all your good work tidying up the copy in this and other motorway articles, but if deleting someone's contribution outright it would be good to know the reason why on the talk section rather than just finding it gone and having to search the edit history. My opinion is that a direct link is more user-friendly, however if the consensus is that a Google Maps link is not appropriate then I would be happy for it to be replaced by long/lat coordinates so that any map engine can be used. [[User:Baldy Bill|Baldy Bill]] ([[User talk:Baldy Bill|talk]]) 10:40, 2 January 2012 (UTC) |
||
:this junction definitely needs a picture, especially as it's linked from [[Spaghetti junction]]. Is there some way it can be included as an [[iframe]] so that it's actually Google displaying it, avoiding any copyright issues [[Special:Contributions/94.174.119.101|94.174.119.101]] ([[User talk:94.174.119.101|talk]]) 07:25, 8 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
----North /South issue Worsley/Preston. At 1832 BST on 28/5/12 Worsley shown as north terminus and Preston as south. Clearly wrong. All other junctions seem in accurate position reading down but it should read south to north in ascending junction numbers starting at Worsley and ending at Preston. I will do my best to edit. [[Special:Contributions/82.17.193.126|82.17.193.126]] ([[User talk:82.17.193.126|talk]]) 17:36, 28 May 2012 (UTC)Matt |
----North /South issue Worsley/Preston. At 1832 BST on 28/5/12 Worsley shown as north terminus and Preston as south. Clearly wrong. All other junctions seem in accurate position reading down but it should read south to north in ascending junction numbers starting at Worsley and ending at Preston. I will do my best to edit. [[Special:Contributions/82.17.193.126|82.17.193.126]] ([[User talk:82.17.193.126|talk]]) 17:36, 28 May 2012 (UTC)Matt |
Revision as of 07:26, 8 March 2015
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Worsley Braided Interchange
Google maps link deleted by "John" on 01 January 2012 restored, this is a useful image of what has been described in over 100 words, and needs to be inserted as an external link due to the fact that Google imagery is copyright and therefore cannot be inserted as a picture. Thanks for all your good work tidying up the copy in this and other motorway articles, but if deleting someone's contribution outright it would be good to know the reason why on the talk section rather than just finding it gone and having to search the edit history. My opinion is that a direct link is more user-friendly, however if the consensus is that a Google Maps link is not appropriate then I would be happy for it to be replaced by long/lat coordinates so that any map engine can be used. Baldy Bill (talk) 10:40, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- this junction definitely needs a picture, especially as it's linked from Spaghetti junction. Is there some way it can be included as an iframe so that it's actually Google displaying it, avoiding any copyright issues 94.174.119.101 (talk) 07:25, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
North /South issue Worsley/Preston. At 1832 BST on 28/5/12 Worsley shown as north terminus and Preston as south. Clearly wrong. All other junctions seem in accurate position reading down but it should read south to north in ascending junction numbers starting at Worsley and ending at Preston. I will do my best to edit. 82.17.193.126 (talk) 17:36, 28 May 2012 (UTC)Matt
- Start-Class Lancashire and Cumbria articles
- Mid-importance Lancashire and Cumbria articles
- Start-Class UK geography articles
- Mid-importance UK geography articles
- Unassessed Highways articles
- Mid-importance Highways articles
- Unassessed UK road transport articles
- Unknown-importance UK road transport articles
- WikiProject UK Roads
- Unassessed Road transport articles
- Unknown-importance Road transport articles
- WikiProject Highways articles