Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EP3 (Basement Jaxx EP): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 14:50, 22 April 2015

EP3 (Basement Jaxx EP)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have been unsuccessful in trying to establish the notability of this subject. Lachlan Foley (talk) 06:00, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- Easily verified notability. Google mentions books reviewing them that were published to the Library of Congress, Amazon, there's professionally made music videos, vice.com has articles on them etc. [1], which lead me to [2]. Other mentions: guardian.com[3], MTV[www.mtv.com/artists/basement-jaxx], Rolling Stone Mag [4], the BBC [5] -- IamM1rv (talk) 14:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The band has not been nominated for deletion as this is just for a specific release from the band. A band being notable does not make every album they release notable (see WP:NOTINHERITED). However, if even some non-substantial and trivial sources can be found, a redirect is probably in order. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 15:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars: ... did you know that this particular release made it into a top 50 list published in a book release in Britain before you posted? I pulled 6 references, not going to bother to copypasta here, just making sure you're informed about this specific report and the nature of all related reports for Jaxx. I did a copy & paste to all of the Jaxx albums, because that's exactly what the poster here did to all of the albums without fact checking the band or the albums. Read down the list of deletes for this particular day and you will see they reported a reputable and notable band that put these out too - which shows that they did not do any research as required by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#Nominating article(s) for deletion. It essentially wastes the time of other wiki users as they did not do due diligence or even have the courtesy of using a "bundle" report. -- IamM1rv (talk) 14:49, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 :'''Keep''' -- Easily verified notability.  Google mentions books reviewing them that were published to the Library of Congress, Amazon, there's professionally made music videos, vice.com has articles on them etc. [https://openlibrary.org/books/OL16773783M/The_Pitchfork_500], which lead me to [http://www.amazon.com/The-Pitchfork-500-Greatest-Present/dp/1416562028].   Other mentions:  guardian.com[http://www.theguardian.com/music/2014/aug/18/basement-jaxx-junto-album-stream], MTV[www.mtv.com/artists/basement-jaxx], Rolling Stone Mag [http://www.rollingstone.com/music/albumreviews/basement-jaxx-junto-20140826], the BBC [http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/artists/28cbf94d-0700-4095-a188-37e373b069a7] -- [[User:IamM1rv|IamM1rv]] ([[User talk:IamM1rv|talk]]) 14:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 ::The band has not been nominated for deletion as this is just for a specific release from the band. A band being notable does not make every album they release notable (see [[WP:NOTINHERITED]]). However, if even some non-substantial and trivial sources can be found, a '''redirect''' is probably in order. --<font color="blue">Star</font><font color="orange">cheers</font><font color="green">peaks</font><font color="red">news</font><font color="black">lost</font><font color="blue">wars</font><sup>[[User talk:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars|Talk to me]]</sup> 15:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
+:::Hi {{ping|talk:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars}} ... did you know that this particular release made it into a top 50 list published in a book release in Britain before you posted?  I pulled 6 references, not going to bother to copypasta here, just making sure you're informed about this specific report and the nature of all related reports for Jaxx.  I did a copy & paste to all of the Jaxx albums, because that's exactly what the poster here did to all of the albums without fact checking the band or the albums.  Read down the list of deletes for this particular day and you will see they reported a reputable and notable band that put these out too - which shows that they did not do any research as required by [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#Nominating article(s) for deletion]].  It essentially wastes the time of other wiki users as they did not do due diligence or even have the courtesy of using a "bundle" report. --  [[User:IamM1rv|IamM1rv]] ([[User talk:IamM1rv|talk]]) 14:49, 22 April 2015 (UTC)