Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Flood Animations: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Comment.
Line 15: Line 15:
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF4F00;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}'''</span><br />
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF4F00;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 00:19, 18 April 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Mark Flood Animations]]</div>
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 00:19, 18 April 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Mark Flood Animations]]</div>
:'''Delete'''. No notability has been established. Not to mention the procedural stuff above and the lack of reliable sources on this subject. [[User:Luthien22|Luthien22]] ([[User talk:Luthien22|talk]]) 21:26, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:26, 22 April 2015

Mark Flood Animations

Mark Flood Animations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a backdoor attempt at recreating Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Flood (filmmaker) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Flood (animator) both of which have been part of an ongoing attempt at self promotion and advertising. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AnimationWhiz133

As for the article itself, the sources are still (as with its deleted predecessors) being misused, and the few reliable sources included are either Wikipedia:Bombardment or do not always support the attached claims. Still way, way too soon. Grayfell (talk) 19:25, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:19, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No notability has been established. Not to mention the procedural stuff above and the lack of reliable sources on this subject. Luthien22 (talk) 21:26, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]