User talk:Kristuq

Speedy deletion of "Financial Union Tirana (UFT)"

Financial Union Tirana (UFT), a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material..

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Winner 42 Talk to me! 20:22, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

Your addition to Financial Union Tirana (UFT) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:34, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Since you say on the article's talk page that you don't understand how it differs from comparable articles, here's my response, in case you don't see it before the article is deleted:

The entire main paragraph is a communication directly from the bank, and the entire thing is written to give a positive impression. This is promotion.

Besides that, you copied virtually the entire article from their website. This is an apparent gross copyright infringement. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:36, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Promotional language:

• "clear vision"
• "praised the performance of its current agent in Albania"
• "We are very pleased by the progress"
• "I can say that a number of positive developments taking place in our business."

Besides that, nothing in that very long paragraph is a reference article about the bank. It's just a speech. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:39, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

The middle text was an interview from the President of the company and I am not going to change her words, because that is saying things that aren't valid. Do you want that? Yes the text was straight from the article because that is the purpose of the reference or? Since I referenced it I am not going to change information because it goes beyond what is acceptable. That article was from a economic magazine which stays off bias... if the words are used in the interview why should I change them? Kristuq (talk) 21:23, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

I don't believe that an interview with the president of a business has any place in a reference article on the business. This is an encyclopedia, not a magazine nor a brochure for the business nor its website. The purpose of an article is to state factual, neutral information about its topic from the point of view of a disinterested party, not to share the impressions and priorities of the people who are intimately involved in it—as the economics magazine apparently did want to do. The fact that the interview was recorded in an unbiased magazine doesn't alter the fact that it isn't neutral content. Besides that, the economics magazine's holds a copyright on that content. It isn't yours to use. —Largo Plazo (talk) 22:39, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

I guess an even clearer way to state why the interview doesn't belong there is that the article's title indicates that the article will be about UFT, not about "Some of UFT's president's current pronouncements about UFT". —Largo Plazo (talk) 22:51, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:22, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  KrakatoaKatie 10:42, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

can you please tell my why I was blocked. This is a company and there is no promotional information on it. It simply states the history of the company? Please explain? I have worked so hard for all of this and here you come and simply block me because you think I am advertising ???!?!

You've worked hard? You wrote one paragraph and then you pasted in the contents of this page and this page. And you did that at the same time that you provided the edit summary "Addition of text with no copyrighted text" at the time that you recreated the page. —Largo Plazo (talk) 11:45, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Also, stop creating new accounts, like you did at User:Wikifakes1996- this is sockpuppetry, and all the accounts will get blocked very quickly. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:27, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Ok look I am new to this. I thought that by adding the reference you could place text into the page. Sorry for this. I simply wanted to make two pages for two companies that I know. Is it possible that I can get unblocked. I was just asking that you don't delete the whole page simply leave the live which was not copyrighted. Kristuq (talk) 13:55, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

If you want to be unblocked, first read the guidelines at WP:GAB. Then, you need to use {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}, putting your reason where it currently says "your reason here". Joseph2302 (talk) 13:57, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. I have simply one question, why did you not delete the text and leave the few lines which I wrote myself? Because simply deleting the whole page does no good, if you would of left the page, maybe others could of written their part? Kristuq (talk) 14:10, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, and so if copyrighted material is added, then it must be deleted as soon as possible. Also, 90-95% of the information on there was copyrighted, so without it, the article would have been almost nothing. Also, it wasn't actually me who deleted the pages. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:15, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Again I understood the problem with copyrighted, I will not do that again. When I create it again I will make sure not to do the same mistakes. Now regarding that other guy Wikifakes1996, that is my brother. And there is no surprise that he would back me up or recreate what I wanted to create at first, additionally I don't see how he broke the rules. Kristuq (talk) 14

30, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Kristuq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

In wikipedia terms I am just one day old. So I was pretty much learning as I would find out new features. It is not easy for a newcomer to get used to this complex behind the scenes part. Therefore I asked to be unblocked because I was aware of the conditions and the guidelines. I thought it was ok to simply post text as long as I referenced it. Now I know that I will have to write everything myself in order for it to be published here. My main concern was that some of the text was written by me even if it was minatory, so why does the whole page have to be deleted However I do understand the rules and regulations and I will not break them. From now on I will probably ask of anything I don't know so that I don't get blocked, because like most people I do want to help, and I am sorry for the mess that I caused. I simply know of companies and I think they should be up on this page so that people have an easier time when reading about them. This I know because I had to write a paper on them and it was quite difficult to find information. Thank you! Kristuq (talk) 14:07, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=In wikipedia terms I am just one day old. So I was pretty much learning as I would find out new features. It is not easy for a newcomer to get used to this complex behind the scenes part. Therefore I asked to be unblocked because I was aware of the conditions and the guidelines. I thought it was ok to simply post text as long as I referenced it. Now I know that I will have to write everything myself in order for it to be published here. My main concern was that some of the text was written by me even if it was minatory, so why does the whole page have to be deleted However I do understand the rules and regulations and I will not break them. From now on I will probably ask of anything I don't know so that I don't get blocked, because like most people I do want to help, and I am sorry for the mess that I caused. I simply know of companies and I think they should be up on this page so that people have an easier time when reading about them. This I know because I had to write a paper on them and it was quite difficult to find information. Thank you! [[User:Kristuq|Kristuq]] ([[User talk:Kristuq#top|talk]]) 14:07, 23 April 2015 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=In wikipedia terms I am just one day old. So I was pretty much learning as I would find out new features. It is not easy for a newcomer to get used to this complex behind the scenes part. Therefore I asked to be unblocked because I was aware of the conditions and the guidelines. I thought it was ok to simply post text as long as I referenced it. Now I know that I will have to write everything myself in order for it to be published here. My main concern was that some of the text was written by me even if it was minatory, so why does the whole page have to be deleted However I do understand the rules and regulations and I will not break them. From now on I will probably ask of anything I don't know so that I don't get blocked, because like most people I do want to help, and I am sorry for the mess that I caused. I simply know of companies and I think they should be up on this page so that people have an easier time when reading about them. This I know because I had to write a paper on them and it was quite difficult to find information. Thank you! [[User:Kristuq|Kristuq]] ([[User talk:Kristuq#top|talk]]) 14:07, 23 April 2015 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=In wikipedia terms I am just one day old. So I was pretty much learning as I would find out new features. It is not easy for a newcomer to get used to this complex behind the scenes part. Therefore I asked to be unblocked because I was aware of the conditions and the guidelines. I thought it was ok to simply post text as long as I referenced it. Now I know that I will have to write everything myself in order for it to be published here. My main concern was that some of the text was written by me even if it was minatory, so why does the whole page have to be deleted However I do understand the rules and regulations and I will not break them. From now on I will probably ask of anything I don't know so that I don't get blocked, because like most people I do want to help, and I am sorry for the mess that I caused. I simply know of companies and I think they should be up on this page so that people have an easier time when reading about them. This I know because I had to write a paper on them and it was quite difficult to find information. Thank you! [[User:Kristuq|Kristuq]] ([[User talk:Kristuq#top|talk]]) 14:07, 23 April 2015 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

I have a question. After being blocked, did you create the account User:Wikifakes1996? This user was making very similar edits of you, and using multiple accounts is forbidden, see WP:SOCKPUPPET. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:15, 23 April 2015 (UTC)