User talk:Kristuq

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kristuq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

In wikipedia terms I am just one day old. So I was pretty much learning as I would find out new features. It is not easy for a newcomer to get used to this complex behind the scenes part. Therefore I asked to be unblocked because I was aware of the conditions and the guidelines. I thought it was ok to simply post text as long as I referenced it. Now I know that I will have to write everything myself in order for it to be published here. My main concern was that some of the text was written by me even if it was minatory, so why does the whole page have to be deleted However I do understand the rules and regulations and I will not break them. From now on I will probably ask of anything I don't know so that I don't get blocked, because like most people I do want to help, and I am sorry for the mess that I caused. I simply know of companies and I think they should be up on this page so that people have an easier time when reading about them. This I know because I had to write a paper on them and it was quite difficult to find information. Thank you! Kristuq (talk) 15:17, 23 April 2015 (UTC) Kristuq (talk) 14:07, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

(1) You're not going to be unblocked if you intend to try to recreate an advertisement about a non-notable company and (2) regarding your comment below, see WP:BROTHER

. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:59, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Kristuq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am just saying that by blocking you are not solving a problem. By unblocking you are because now I know the rules and I will not write more 'rubbish'. Doesn't that make sense? Kristuq (talk) 16:12, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= I am just saying that by blocking you are not solving a problem. By unblocking you are because now I know the rules and I will not write more 'rubbish'. Doesn't that make sense? [[User:Kristuq|Kristuq]] ([[User talk:Kristuq#top|talk]]) 16:12, 23 April 2015 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= I am just saying that by blocking you are not solving a problem. By unblocking you are because now I know the rules and I will not write more 'rubbish'. Doesn't that make sense? [[User:Kristuq|Kristuq]] ([[User talk:Kristuq#top|talk]]) 16:12, 23 April 2015 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= I am just saying that by blocking you are not solving a problem. By unblocking you are because now I know the rules and I will not write more 'rubbish'. Doesn't that make sense? [[User:Kristuq|Kristuq]] ([[User talk:Kristuq#top|talk]]) 16:12, 23 April 2015 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This is silly, because you're not listening. 95% of what was on there was a copyright vio, it isn't our job to find the good 5%, it was your job to not put in the offending 95%. Also, another article can be written, just not by new users or IP users. Also, the reason no-one seems to trust you is because you posted articles with copyright, claimed they had no copyright, used another account (either directly or indirectly) to make edits whilst blocked, and therefore if unblocked, given your recent history, you'd probably just put up some more copyright vios. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:52, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Well it will be wikipedia's loss, because I can simply make a new account with a different device at a different wifi and edit other posts. Or you can simply unblock this one, let me write a proper article one which I promise to do. This way I get to learn the features correctly. Please don't bring up the copyright again because it was due to confusion again. Look if i really wanted to advertise, I would simply go off and create like 100 accounts and create 100 different pages (I know they will be blocked don't remind me), but I am not I am sticking to my account, that means I want to write a proper article. Kristuq (talk) 15:58, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Threatening to use other accounts is never clever, they'll get blocked soon enough. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Its not a threat. I am just saying that by blocking you are not solving a problem. By unblocking you are because now I know the rules and I will not write more 'rubbish'. Doesn't that make sense? Kristuq (talk) 16:12, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

I've salted the article title, so you don't have to bother using other accounts to attempt to recreate it. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:27, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

OK so now unblock me! Kristuq (talk) 16:29, 23 April 2015 (UTC)