Jump to content

Talk:Vanessa Lynne Bryant: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:
There were some good non-content edits after but it took so much time to undo all this I have to leave it for later. [[Special:Contributions/168.1.75.52|168.1.75.52]] ([[User talk:168.1.75.52|talk]]) 05:29, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
There were some good non-content edits after but it took so much time to undo all this I have to leave it for later. [[Special:Contributions/168.1.75.52|168.1.75.52]] ([[User talk:168.1.75.52|talk]]) 05:29, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
:The edit summary which contained 'Cannot use online rating system as source' was the removal of something sourced to the robing room (which is not a secondary source). An anonymous online rating of a federal judge is not at all relevant nor encyclopedic for us to include. I don't agree at all with this wholesale revert (which includes edits you apparently agree with) so I will be reverting it. [[Special:Contributions/PeterTheFourth|PeterTheFourth]] ([[User Talk:PeterTheFourth|talk]]) 05:42, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
:The edit summary which contained 'Cannot use online rating system as source' was the removal of something sourced to the robing room (which is not a secondary source). An anonymous online rating of a federal judge is not at all relevant nor encyclopedic for us to include. I don't agree at all with this wholesale revert (which includes edits you apparently agree with) so I will be reverting it. [[Special:Contributions/PeterTheFourth|PeterTheFourth]] ([[User Talk:PeterTheFourth|talk]]) 05:42, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
:: Well I'm sorry but that's not how [[WP:BRD]] is supposed to work. You made massive changes, I disagreed, we discuss. Lets discuss! [[Special:Contributions/168.1.75.52|168.1.75.52]] ([[User talk:168.1.75.52|talk]]) 05:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:48, 24 April 2015

Bot-created subpage

A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Vanessa Lynne Bryant was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 16:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Low rating

Should it be mentioned that she is the lowest rated federal judge in the country on the robing room? http://www.therobingroom.com/Judge.aspx?ID=1627 It seems relevant that lawyers have such low regard for her. Not sure if it is a bad thing though! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.172.24.197 (talk) 23:32, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Changes

There seems to have been some misunderstanding resulting in these recent changes. I'll address each edit summary below:

  • Cannot use online rating system as source - the reference to the rating is sourced to a secondary source, see corrected article.
  • Quotes were not found in source cited. - quotes were found in cite previous, order corrected
  • Rating on online system is not relevant to her federal judicial career. - it's a running rating so it's relevant for as long as she's a trial judge

There were some good non-content edits after but it took so much time to undo all this I have to leave it for later. 168.1.75.52 (talk) 05:29, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The edit summary which contained 'Cannot use online rating system as source' was the removal of something sourced to the robing room (which is not a secondary source). An anonymous online rating of a federal judge is not at all relevant nor encyclopedic for us to include. I don't agree at all with this wholesale revert (which includes edits you apparently agree with) so I will be reverting it. PeterTheFourth (talk) 05:42, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well I'm sorry but that's not how WP:BRD is supposed to work. You made massive changes, I disagreed, we discuss. Lets discuss! 168.1.75.52 (talk) 05:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]