Talk:Vanessa Lynne Bryant: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:
There were some good non-content edits after but it took so much time to undo all this I have to leave it for later. [[Special:Contributions/168.1.75.52|168.1.75.52]] ([[User talk:168.1.75.52|talk]]) 05:29, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
There were some good non-content edits after but it took so much time to undo all this I have to leave it for later. [[Special:Contributions/168.1.75.52|168.1.75.52]] ([[User talk:168.1.75.52|talk]]) 05:29, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
:The edit summary which contained 'Cannot use online rating system as source' was the removal of something sourced to the robing room (which is not a secondary source). An anonymous online rating of a federal judge is not at all relevant nor encyclopedic for us to include. I don't agree at all with this wholesale revert (which includes edits you apparently agree with) so I will be reverting it. [[Special:Contributions/PeterTheFourth|PeterTheFourth]] ([[User Talk:PeterTheFourth|talk]]) 05:42, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
:The edit summary which contained 'Cannot use online rating system as source' was the removal of something sourced to the robing room (which is not a secondary source). An anonymous online rating of a federal judge is not at all relevant nor encyclopedic for us to include. I don't agree at all with this wholesale revert (which includes edits you apparently agree with) so I will be reverting it. [[Special:Contributions/PeterTheFourth|PeterTheFourth]] ([[User Talk:PeterTheFourth|talk]]) 05:42, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
:: Well I'm sorry but that's not how [[WP:BRD]] is supposed to work. You made massive changes, I disagreed, we discuss. Lets discuss! [[Special:Contributions/168.1.75.52|168.1.75.52]] ([[User talk:168.1.75.52|talk]]) 05:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
:: Well I'm sorry but that's not how [[WP:BRD]] is supposed to work. You made massive changes, I disagreed, we discuss. Lets discuss! BTW, the reference "In October 2011, Judge Bryant was rated the worst judge in the United States" is sourced to allgov. If an RS sees fit to mention it it's not our place to question it. [[Special:Contributions/168.1.75.52|168.1.75.52]] ([[User talk:168.1.75.52|talk]]) 05:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:50, 24 April 2015

Bot-created subpage

A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Vanessa Lynne Bryant was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 16:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Low rating

Should it be mentioned that she is the lowest rated federal judge in the country on the robing room? http://www.therobingroom.com/Judge.aspx?ID=1627 It seems relevant that lawyers have such low regard for her. Not sure if it is a bad thing though! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.172.24.197 (talk) 23:32, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Changes

There seems to have been some misunderstanding resulting in these recent changes. I'll address each edit summary below:

  • Cannot use online rating system as source - the reference to the rating is sourced to a secondary source, see corrected article.
  • Quotes were not found in source cited. - quotes were found in cite previous, order corrected
  • Rating on online system is not relevant to her federal judicial career. - it's a running rating so it's relevant for as long as she's a trial judge

There were some good non-content edits after but it took so much time to undo all this I have to leave it for later. 168.1.75.52 (talk) 05:29, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The edit summary which contained 'Cannot use online rating system as source' was the removal of something sourced to the robing room (which is not a secondary source). An anonymous online rating of a federal judge is not at all relevant nor encyclopedic for us to include. I don't agree at all with this wholesale revert (which includes edits you apparently agree with) so I will be reverting it. PeterTheFourth (talk) 05:42, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well I'm sorry but that's not how WP:BRD is supposed to work. You made massive changes, I disagreed, we discuss. Lets discuss! BTW, the reference "In October 2011, Judge Bryant was rated the worst judge in the United States" is sourced to allgov. If an RS sees fit to mention it it's not our place to question it. 168.1.75.52 (talk) 05:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]