User talk:RichGibson: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:37, 24 April 2015

Welcome!

Hello, RichGibson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! →Ollie (talk • contribs) 22:13, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Military museum Lešany

A tag has been placed on Military museum Lešany requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Scapler (talk) 06:41, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gourmet (magazine), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:44, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Cookie (magazine). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:48, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, RichGibson. You have new messages at WikiDan61's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Waldorf education

RE your recent edits: an article about an educational system that comprises more than 1,000 schools isn't the place for information about individual schools. See the talk page. hgilbert (talk) 18:32, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia's policies on Original research before editing this article further. hgilbert (talk) 23:03, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Museum_of_Applied_Arts,_Vienna&diff=658953726&oldid=658796951, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Personal attacks are not tolerated. If you continue you ll be blocked without further notice. Magioladitis (talk) 07:23, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted material

Please read WP:IOWN or how to add copyrighted material without getting Wikipedia into troubles. Thanks! -- Magioladitis (talk)

My work was not marked as a 'potential infringment of copyright.' My work was reverted. I am deeply offended by these actions. I suppose that you can run this club the way that you want, except, I do not think you are running it according to your self professed rules. I do not believe that you, or the original reverter, have any idea of who owns the copyright to the words which I added to Wikipedia, and I am almost positive that you have no idea as to the details of Austrian Copyright law.

All that I see is that work that I did, work which the Museum thanked me for, has been reverted. And that after I corrected that ignorant reversion, you reverted it again.

So yay, thanks. Thanks for demonstrating the nature of the wikipedia process.

No tagging the article that it is potentially infringing, just revert it all.

That is a stupid process which helps to destroy wikipedia.