Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RISE Award: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
reply, press releases are not reliable, independent sources |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*'''Keep''' (as article creator) - covered by adult industry press (including one with its own separate awards program) also related to WikiProjects other than Porn. --[[User:Scalhotrod|Scalhotrod]] [[User_talk:Scalhotrod|(Talk)]] ☮ღ☺ 18:08, 3 May 2015 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' (as article creator) - covered by adult industry press (including one with its own separate awards program) also related to WikiProjects other than Porn. --[[User:Scalhotrod|Scalhotrod]] [[User_talk:Scalhotrod|(Talk)]] ☮ღ☺ 18:08, 3 May 2015 (UTC) |
||
:And, as the article creator, you know perfectly well that reposted ( and sometimes slightly retouched) press releases do nothing to establish notability, and are not the reliable, independent sources needed to support an article. [[User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz|The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo)]] ([[User talk:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz|talk]]) 18:35, 3 May 2015 (UTC) |
:And, as the article creator, you know perfectly well that reposted ( and sometimes slightly retouched) press releases do nothing to establish notability, and are not the reliable, independent sources needed to support an article. [[User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz|The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo)]] ([[User talk:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz|talk]]) 18:35, 3 May 2015 (UTC) |
||
::What you unilaterally believe to be spam on Wikipedia articles is not reflective of everyone's opinion. [[User:Hanswar32|Hanswar32]] ([[User talk:Hanswar32|talk]]) 19:32, 3 May 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep''' per Scalhotrod's reasoning. [[User:Hanswar32|Hanswar32]] ([[User talk:Hanswar32|talk]]) 19:32, 3 May 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:33, 3 May 2015
- RISE Award (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability. No independent sourcing. All refs are either published by the subject or based on its PR material. NN award sponsored by NN website which periodically spams itself in Wikipedia articles. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 11:57, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep (as article creator) - covered by adult industry press (including one with its own separate awards program) also related to WikiProjects other than Porn. --Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 18:08, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- And, as the article creator, you know perfectly well that reposted ( and sometimes slightly retouched) press releases do nothing to establish notability, and are not the reliable, independent sources needed to support an article. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 18:35, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- What you unilaterally believe to be spam on Wikipedia articles is not reflective of everyone's opinion. Hanswar32 (talk) 19:32, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per Scalhotrod's reasoning. Hanswar32 (talk) 19:32, 3 May 2015 (UTC)