Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Washington mural: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Ianakoz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:


Hi [[User:Narutolovehinata5|Narutolovehinata5]]. I believe this mural is notable and has significant news coverage in local DC newspapers and magazines. I am working on adding more of that information -- didn't really get a chance to before you flagged the article. I also have a short video I made of the mural. I am part of a Wikipedia class at American University and doing a project about public art in DC, and increasing the amount of videos on Wikipedia to increase the awareness of DC public art.
Hi [[User:Narutolovehinata5|Narutolovehinata5]]. I believe this mural is notable and has significant news coverage in local DC newspapers and magazines. I am working on adding more of that information -- didn't really get a chance to before you flagged the article. I also have a short video I made of the mural. I am part of a Wikipedia class at American University and doing a project about public art in DC, and increasing the amount of videos on Wikipedia to increase the awareness of DC public art.

[[User:Narutolovehinata5|Narutolovehinata5]]: Any permanent, commissioned, legal mural in a public space is notable, especially if the piece drew some controversy. Since this article was created just moments ago, please refrain from requesting the article to be deleted until some editors have a chance to further enhance it.
ianakoz 01:36, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:36, 5 May 2015

George Washington mural (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be a notable piece or art. A search reveals that the only coverage it has received is the reference which is in the article. Significant coverage in multiple reliable sources is lacking. It looks pretty, though. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:24, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Narutolovehinata5. I believe this mural is notable and has significant news coverage in local DC newspapers and magazines. I am working on adding more of that information -- didn't really get a chance to before you flagged the article. I also have a short video I made of the mural. I am part of a Wikipedia class at American University and doing a project about public art in DC, and increasing the amount of videos on Wikipedia to increase the awareness of DC public art.

Narutolovehinata5: Any permanent, commissioned, legal mural in a public space is notable, especially if the piece drew some controversy. Since this article was created just moments ago, please refrain from requesting the article to be deleted until some editors have a chance to further enhance it. ianakoz 01:36, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]