User talk:79.223.26.113

Quote from Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Others'27 comments

Per the guidelines at WP:TPO I have the right to remove comments without your permission, should they fall under any of the following.

*Removing prohibited material such as libel, personal details, or violations of copyright, living persons, banning, or anti-promotional policies

*Removing harmful posts.

I asked you several times to remove them, even pointing out what to be removed. But because you refused to remove libellous and harmful posts, then TPO gives me the right to remove them instead, as reasonable time has been given for you to carry it out, but you refused to comply. Wes Mouse | ^T@lk 14:35, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Wow, now your are all over the place.

I did not post libel, personal details, or violations of copyright, living persons, banning, or anti-promotional policies.-79.223.26.113 (talk) 14:39, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Clearly you did, as I marked the offending comments with the {{RPA}} template. Remove or rephrase the offending comments with immediate effect. Wes Mouse | ^T@lk 14:41, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

I "clearly" did, because you said so???-79.223.26.113 (talk)

I found your remarks to be highly offensive, and asked you to redact them. Comply with a request please! Wes Mouse | ^T@lk 14:48, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

"Offending" is not the same as "libel", and cannot possibly be.-79.223.26.113 (talk) 14:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Talk:Eurovision Song Contest. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 15:14, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

79.223.26.113 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I only reverted changes that are very clearly against policy (TPO), and such reverts do not violate 3RR. 79.223.26.113 (talk) 15:17, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I only reverted changes that are very clearly against policy (TPO), and such reverts do not violate 3RR. [[Special:Contributions/79.223.26.113|79.223.26.113]] ([[User talk:79.223.26.113#top|talk]]) 15:17, 27 May 2015 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I only reverted changes that are very clearly against policy (TPO), and such reverts do not violate 3RR. [[Special:Contributions/79.223.26.113|79.223.26.113]] ([[User talk:79.223.26.113#top|talk]]) 15:17, 27 May 2015 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I only reverted changes that are very clearly against policy (TPO), and such reverts do not violate 3RR. [[Special:Contributions/79.223.26.113|79.223.26.113]] ([[User talk:79.223.26.113#top|talk]]) 15:17, 27 May 2015 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

FYI: Unblock or not, I will now take a break. Happy editing!-79.223.26.113 (talk) 15:21, 27 May 2015 (UTC)