Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tachikawa-ryu (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 09:26, 15 June 2015

Tachikawa-ryu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has serious reliability and verifiability problems. The overwhelming majority of this article traces back to John Stevens who is not reliable. Mr. Stevens believes that Tachikawa-ryu persists to this very day as some sort of secret underground sex cult. Additionally Stevens’s “Tantra of the Tachikawa Ryu” is a work of erotic fiction and certainly not a reliable source. The Tachikawa-ryu article on Japanese Wikipedia may or may not have reliable sources, but they aren’t doing this article any good, and there’s no indication that they ever will.

Additionally, parts of the article are written from such a ridiculously in-universe perspective as to be totally incomprehensible. This article has been tagged for years; it’s high time it got deleted. 76.107.171.90 (talk) 01:34, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I completed the nom for the IP. ansh 666 02:20, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 02:31, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 :{{la|Tachikawa-ryu}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tachikawa-ryu (2nd nomination)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 June 15#{{anchorencode:Tachikawa-ryu}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tachikawa-ryu_(2nd_nomination) Stats]</span>)
 :({{Find sources AFD|Tachikawa-ryu}})
-This article has serious reliability and verifiability problems.  The overwhelming majority of this article traces back to John Stevens who is not reliable.  Mr. Stevens believes that [[Tachikawa-ryu]] persists to this very day as some sort of secret underground sex cult.  Additionally Stevens’s “Tantra of the Tachikawa Ryu” is a work or erotic fiction and certainly not a reliable source.  The Tachikawa-ryu article on Japanese Wikipedia may or may not have reliable sources, but they aren’t doing this article any good, and there’s no indication that they ever will.
+This article has serious reliability and verifiability problems.  The overwhelming majority of this article traces back to John Stevens who is not reliable.  Mr. Stevens believes that [[Tachikawa-ryu]] persists to this very day as some sort of secret underground sex cult.  Additionally Stevens’s “Tantra of the Tachikawa Ryu” is a work of erotic fiction and certainly not a reliable source.  The Tachikawa-ryu article on Japanese Wikipedia may or may not have reliable sources, but they aren’t doing this article any good, and there’s no indication that they ever will.
 Additionally, parts of the article are written from such a ridiculously in-universe perspective as to be totally incomprehensible.  This article has been tagged for years; it’s high time it got deleted.    [[Special:Contributions/76.107.171.90|76.107.171.90]] ([[User talk:76.107.171.90|talk]]) 01:34, 15 June 2015 (UTC)