Jump to content

User talk:Arkangel lucifer: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
General note: Unconstructive editing on Religion in Belgium. (TW)
Line 45: Line 45:
== June 2015 ==
== June 2015 ==
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of [[Special:Contributions/Arkangel lucifer|your recent edits]], such as the edit you made to [[:Religion in Belgium]], did not appear to be constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome page]] which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]] for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive1 --> [[User:JimRenge|JimRenge]] ([[User talk:JimRenge|talk]]) 08:21, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of [[Special:Contributions/Arkangel lucifer|your recent edits]], such as the edit you made to [[:Religion in Belgium]], did not appear to be constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome page]] which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]] for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive1 --> [[User:JimRenge|JimRenge]] ([[User talk:JimRenge|talk]]) 08:21, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

The infobox says 58% and the introduction 57%, please make up your mind! [[User:Arkangel lucifer|Arkangel lucifer]] ([[User talk:Arkangel lucifer#top|talk]]) 08:24, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:24, 20 June 2015

Nomination of Andenne Bears for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andenne Bears is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andenne Bears until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 17:59, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brussels Tigers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brussels Tigers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brussels Tigers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 14:10, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Grez-Doiceau Fighting Turtles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grez-Doiceau Fighting Turtles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grez-Doiceau Fighting Turtles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 14:10, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Liège Monarchs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liège Monarchs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liège Monarchs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 14:11, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Charleroi Cougars for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charleroi Cougars is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charleroi Cougars until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 14:13, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tournai Phoenix for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tournai Phoenix is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tournai Phoenix until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 14:13, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Luxembourg Steelers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luxembourg Steelers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luxembourg Steelers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 14:14, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Religion in Belgium, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 08:21, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The infobox says 58% and the introduction 57%, please make up your mind! Arkangel lucifer (talk) 08:24, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]