Jump to content

Talk:Unfriended: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Banner Shell.
Line 20: Line 20:
The marketing section needs a copyedit cleanup.
The marketing section needs a copyedit cleanup.
I may be seeing things, but you can remove the tag if you want. [[User:CyanoTex|CyanoTex; The Neutral Wikipedian]] 14:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
I may be seeing things, but you can remove the tag if you want. [[User:CyanoTex|CyanoTex; The Neutral Wikipedian]] 14:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

== Any legitimacy on that end credit scene bit? ==

I can't seem to find any talks of it online. --[[Special:Contributions/97.92.93.185|97.92.93.185]] ([[User talk:97.92.93.185|talk]]) 22:51, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:51, 20 June 2015

Poster

I've re-added the poster since there's no good reason at this point in time to remove it. It was originally released as Cybernatural and marking it as a work-in-progress title is factually incorrect. Work-in-progress titles are titles that are used before the film was released, however this film was given a release via the film festival circuit, so Cybernatural is the original title of the film. With that in mind, it's reasonable to keep the poster on the article because not only does it reflect on the original title of the film but we also have nothing to replace it with. When the new poster comes out we can always delete the poster at that point of time or move it down in the article. Until that time comes, removing it doesn't do anything for the article and since it was given a film festival release and was titled this (and most of the coverage refers to it as Cybernatural), it won't be misleading to leave it in the article. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 11:36, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit

The marketing section needs a copyedit cleanup. I may be seeing things, but you can remove the tag if you want. CyanoTex; The Neutral Wikipedian 14:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Any legitimacy on that end credit scene bit?

I can't seem to find any talks of it online. --97.92.93.185 (talk) 22:51, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]