Talk:Android software development: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:16, 12 July 2015

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Software: Computing B‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Mid-importance).

"The Simple Project"

It doesn't make much sense to have Basic4Android lumped under "The Simple Project" and then say that The Simple Project is no longer active while Basic4Android is very active. Why not change the heading to "Basic4Android"? 71.143.161.236 (talk) 12:27, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fragmentation Section

This section needs to be both brought up to present and altered in tone from an advocatory "explaining away" of fragmentation issues to an objective reporting of the current state of affairs. Uptake of new Android versions is paralyzed due to manufacturer-specific implementations which can't be upgraded independently by users. Fragmentation is so severe that app and even Web developers are compelled to put extraordinary resources into testing and still can't reliably support all devices.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_os#Usage_share

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/hardware/the-sorry-state-of-android-hardware-fragmentation/19427

http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2012/03/android-fragmentation-also-a-challenge-for-web-developers/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.180.5.218 (talk) 15:43, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is relevant to 0.9% of the customer base only. "Severe" is quite an overstatement. I have a few things to say about this.

Web developers have been encouraged for years to use ems instead of pixels. Different screen sizes are not a problem except for the most ancient of websites.
Android toolkit resizes at different resolutions.
Resources in apks are at different resolution. (ldpi, mdpi, hdpi and xhdpi)
The PC market is way more fragmented.

As a developer I think this section is a load of selectively-researched FUD. It should go.--davidh.oz.au 05:20, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

the HyperNext issue

this section should be generic and include all such, including Caede at caede.curl.com G. Robert Shiplett 12:12, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

ADB

Merge ADB and Fastboot

Should Android Debug Bridge be merged into this article? I think so They think it's all over (talk) 19:25, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Also merged in the article "Fastboot". If this article (Android software development) ever gets too large, the entire section "Software development tools" can be summarized and spun off to a new separate article. (I refactored the title of this talk section to include the subtitle: "Merge ADB and Fastboot".) Sparkie82 (t•c) 04:37, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

a handset emulator?

I wish that there were more on that, such as, can it be used to run Android apps on one's PC? --Jerome Potts (talk) 03:38, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

no mention of android studio?

http://developer.android.com/sdk/installing/studio.html#Updating — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.219.59.208 (talk) 13:09, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There's already a separate article, Android Studio. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 21:27, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"officially supported": Eclipse or Android Studio ?

I am a little bit puzzled: In Sec. 1.1 someone says: "The officially supported integrated development environment (IDE) is Eclipse using the Android Development Tools (ADT) Plugin, though IntelliJ IDEA IDE (all editions) fully supports Android development out of the box" but when I visit the "Building Your First App" intro on https://developer.android.com/ it refers me to the community edition Android Studio. I am a newbie in Android development, so I would appreciate any clarification. Additionally Android Studio is labeled on its download page as "The official Android IDE" on 14. Jan. 2015. Treutwein (talk • contribs)

IDE on Android?

Hello, do any of these SDK/IDE run on an Android device? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.5.142.174 (talk) 16:59, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are unofficial Android-based dev tools. AIDE is one. I'll look for coverage and see if something can be added to the article. Reach Out to the Truth 04:17, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SCSK (Tokyo) CAEDE cross-platform framework

SCSK (Tokyo) CAEDE cross-platform framework not even mentioned although based on MIT's Curl expression-based programming language developed as a web alternative to LISP.

99.251.239.140 (talk) 13:16, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 53: / Line 53: @@
 do any of these SDK/IDE run on an Android device?  <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/46.5.142.174|46.5.142.174]] ([[User talk:46.5.142.174|talk]]) 16:59, 6 April 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 :There are unofficial Android-based dev tools. AIDE is one. I'll look for coverage and see if something can be added to the article. [[User talk:Reach Out to the Truth|Reach Out to the Truth]] 04:17, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
+== SCSK (Tokyo) CAEDE cross-platform framework ==
+SCSK (Tokyo) CAEDE cross-platform framework not even mentioned although based on MIT's Curl expression-based programming language developed as a web alternative to LISP.
+[[Special:Contributions/99.251.239.140|99.251.239.140]] ([[User talk:99.251.239.140|talk]]) 13:16, 12 July 2015 (UTC)