Jump to content

Talk:Incomplete Nature: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m start, low
Line 4: Line 4:
==Scope==
==Scope==
This article is more about the ideas in the book than the book itself. This article should be reduce to cover only the book. If the notions in the book are notable, then they should move to their own article and given sensible sources (rather than just the primary source -- the book itself). -- [[User:Mikeblas|Mikeblas]] ([[User talk:Mikeblas|talk]]) 15:02, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
This article is more about the ideas in the book than the book itself. This article should be reduce to cover only the book. If the notions in the book are notable, then they should move to their own article and given sensible sources (rather than just the primary source -- the book itself). -- [[User:Mikeblas|Mikeblas]] ([[User talk:Mikeblas|talk]]) 15:02, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

:What would the title of such an article be? {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} [[Special:Contributions/212.95.237.92|212.95.237.92]] ([[User talk:212.95.237.92|talk]]) 19:17, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:17, 14 August 2015

WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Literature / Mind / Contemporary Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Philosophical literature
Taskforce icon
Philosophy of mind
Taskforce icon
Contemporary philosophy

Scope

This article is more about the ideas in the book than the book itself. This article should be reduce to cover only the book. If the notions in the book are notable, then they should move to their own article and given sensible sources (rather than just the primary source -- the book itself). -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:02, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What would the title of such an article be? {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 212.95.237.92 (talk) 19:17, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]