Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/156.61.250.250: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small>
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small>


The last comment on this SPI (now in the archive):

{{talkquote|There is nothing to check here.}} - Risker, filing the complaint. [[Special:Contributions/5.150.92.20|5.150.92.20]] ([[User talk:5.150.92.20|talk]]) 12:20, 16 August 2015 (UTC)


====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====

Revision as of 12:20, 16 August 2015

156.61.250.250

156.61.250.250 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)


16 August 2015

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets


156.61.250.250 was blocked for 6 months in May for persistent disruptive editing. A couple of days after that block, the 5.150.92.20 IP address resumes the blocked editor's pattern of editing, beginning with specifically continuing a discussion someone had with the blocked editor with the preface "I think it's time to add a comment which has been sitting on 156.61.250.250's talk page for days waiting to be pasted over." The blocked IP editor's edits concerning the Julian calendar in the state of Georgia have been continued by the new IP address here, which is an oddly specific thing for two IP address that both geolocate to London, England to both have in common. Both editors also use Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language[1][2] and Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)[3][4] (both IP addresses arguing the for the removal of Pending Changes there). This appears to be a pretty obvious case of block evasion by the IP. - Aoidh (talk) 12:13, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

The last comment on this SPI (now in the archive):

There is nothing to check here.

- Risker, filing the complaint. 5.150.92.20 (talk) 12:20, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments