Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freja Film: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
**'''Comment''': also note, the same user has left a message on this AFDs [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Freja Film|talk page]]. -- [[User:1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR|<span style="font-size:110%;background-color:#FFFF99;">'''1Wiki8'''</span><span style="font-size:80%;">Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR]]</span> ([[User_talk:1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR|talk]]) 08:02, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
**'''Comment''': also note, the same user has left a message on this AFDs [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Freja Film|talk page]]. -- [[User:1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR|<span style="font-size:110%;background-color:#FFFF99;">'''1Wiki8'''</span><span style="font-size:80%;">Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR]]</span> ([[User_talk:1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR|talk]]) 08:02, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' - If that kind of extremely disruptive behavior happens again, I think going to administrators to give notice would be justified. [[User:CoffeeWithMarkets|CoffeeWithMarkets]] ([[User talk:CoffeeWithMarkets|talk]]) 08:32, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' - If that kind of extremely disruptive behavior happens again, I think going to administrators to give notice would be justified. [[User:CoffeeWithMarkets|CoffeeWithMarkets]] ([[User talk:CoffeeWithMarkets|talk]]) 08:32, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' yes that was a misplaced contribution to the AfD debate. It is not always easy to navigate Wikipedia and where the right things should go. RE (assumption made by Coffee withMarkets.Filmartiste 09:00, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:00, 11 September 2015

Freja Film (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable organization - PROD declined. Standard searches do not reveal enough significant coverage in independent reliable sources. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 00:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 00:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 00:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 00:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • No Not Delete Important cultural organisation for women in film in Sweden and an international contact center for women in film globally in the 1980's. Should be culturally preserved. Women's history should not be erased. Filmartiste 05:48, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment: I have deleted the following commentary which had been added to the main article[1], but it could be regarded as a misplaced contribution to this AfD debate: "In September 2015, this entry in Wikipedia is being debated about being deleted by a few individuals who if this does happen, do not think it is important to preserve the history of women in film which has been historically erased. The criteria for erasure is that the group can't be found in mechanical "search" engines, robots. ". AllyD (talk) 07:19, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - If that kind of extremely disruptive behavior happens again, I think going to administrators to give notice would be justified. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 08:32, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment yes that was a misplaced contribution to the AfD debate. It is not always easy to navigate Wikipedia and where the right things should go. RE (assumption made by Coffee withMarkets.Filmartiste 09:00, 11 September 2015 (UTC)