Talk:Turku Centre for Computer Science: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
I still don't understand. |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
First, the page seems to contain outdated information. Second, somehow the page seems to be more like a advert than a neutral, informative wikipage. [[Special:Contributions/92.242.166.141|92.242.166.141]] ([[User talk:92.242.166.141|talk]]) 21:09, 21 March 2011 (UTC) |
First, the page seems to contain outdated information. Second, somehow the page seems to be more like a advert than a neutral, informative wikipage. [[Special:Contributions/92.242.166.141|92.242.166.141]] ([[User talk:92.242.166.141|talk]]) 21:09, 21 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
: What would be a good example (or two) of similar organizations described more properly in Wikipedia, to change the style of this page towards? [[User:Bgt|Bgt]] ([[User talk:Bgt|talk]]) 05:30, 23 April 2012 (UTC) |
: What would be a good example (or two) of similar organizations described more properly in Wikipedia, to change the style of this page towards? [[User:Bgt|Bgt]] ([[User talk:Bgt|talk]]) 05:30, 23 April 2012 (UTC) |
||
: I still don't understand the difference that makes this page a rewiev, but doesn't make, for example [[University_of_Turku|University of Turku]] and [[Wikimedia_Foundation|Wikimedia Foundation]]. As a person, who is planning on still contributing to Wikipedia, I would greatly appreciate to be explained. The text only contains figures and referred facts. There is no ambiguous phrasing, such as "is the best" or "high quality". The most vague and promotional part that I find is "The purpose of TUCS is to coordinate the education, research and societal interaction of the affiliate Universities in the field of ICT.", which for me appears similar to the Wikimedia foundation's "The Wikimedia Foundation's stated goal is to develop and maintain open content, wiki-based projects and to provide the full contents of those projects to the public free of charge." [[User:Bgt|Bgt]] ([[User talk:Bgt|talk]]) 06:27, 16 September 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 06:28, 16 September 2015
 | Finland Unassessed | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Advert?
First, the page seems to contain outdated information. Second, somehow the page seems to be more like a advert than a neutral, informative wikipage. 92.242.166.141 (talk) 21:09, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- What would be a good example (or two) of similar organizations described more properly in Wikipedia, to change the style of this page towards? Bgt (talk) 05:30, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
- I still don't understand the difference that makes this page a rewiev, but doesn't make, for example University of Turku and Wikimedia Foundation. As a person, who is planning on still contributing to Wikipedia, I would greatly appreciate to be explained. The text only contains figures and referred facts. There is no ambiguous phrasing, such as "is the best" or "high quality". The most vague and promotional part that I find is "The purpose of TUCS is to coordinate the education, research and societal interaction of the affiliate Universities in the field of ICT.", which for me appears similar to the Wikimedia foundation's "The Wikimedia Foundation's stated goal is to develop and maintain open content, wiki-based projects and to provide the full contents of those projects to the public free of charge." Bgt (talk) 06:27, 16 September 2015 (UTC)