Seedfeeder: Difference between revisions
→Work: upright seems better so it doesn't interfere with section below |
→Reception: rem redundant mention of year |
||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
''[[The Huffington Post]]''{{'s}} Andres Jauregui said the illustrations were "anything but shy" and that "by rendering intense acts of coupling in a sterile, almost instructional manner, Seedfeeder's drawings have a normalizing effect on bedroom play that some might consider taboo".<ref name=Jauregui/> He wrote that the sexual acts Seedfeeder illustrates "aren't weird, but the plastic, detached style in which they're rendered is bizarrely matter-of-fact, like the airline safety pamphlets that the illustrator says inspired them". Furthermore, he said: "Some wouldn't consider it art, but it's not porn, either. The drawings are educational, but they serve a purpose beyond illustration."<ref name=Jauregui>{{cite news|last=Jauregui|first=Andres|title=Wikipedia's SeedFeeder Is The Weirdest Sex Illustrator You've Never Heard Of (NSFW)|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/11/12/seedfeeder-wikipedia-illustrator_n_6145146.html|accessdate=November 14, 2014|work=[[The Huffington Post]]|date=November 12, 2014}}</ref> |
''[[The Huffington Post]]''{{'s}} Andres Jauregui said the illustrations were "anything but shy" and that "by rendering intense acts of coupling in a sterile, almost instructional manner, Seedfeeder's drawings have a normalizing effect on bedroom play that some might consider taboo".<ref name=Jauregui/> He wrote that the sexual acts Seedfeeder illustrates "aren't weird, but the plastic, detached style in which they're rendered is bizarrely matter-of-fact, like the airline safety pamphlets that the illustrator says inspired them". Furthermore, he said: "Some wouldn't consider it art, but it's not porn, either. The drawings are educational, but they serve a purpose beyond illustration."<ref name=Jauregui>{{cite news|last=Jauregui|first=Andres|title=Wikipedia's SeedFeeder Is The Weirdest Sex Illustrator You've Never Heard Of (NSFW)|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/11/12/seedfeeder-wikipedia-illustrator_n_6145146.html|accessdate=November 14, 2014|work=[[The Huffington Post]]|date=November 12, 2014}}</ref> |
||
[[Artnet]] columnist [[Paddy Johnson]] listed Seedfeeder's work as one of the "Top 10 Digital Artworks of 2014" |
[[Artnet]] columnist [[Paddy Johnson]] listed Seedfeeder's work as one of the "Top 10 Digital Artworks of 2014".<ref name=artnetTop10>{{cite web|last1=Johnson|first1=Paddy|title=The Top 10 Digital Artworks of 2014|url=https://news.artnet.com/art-world/the-top-10-digital-artworks-of-2014-205405|website=Artnet News|accessdate=25 September 2015}}</ref> |
||
===Negative reactions=== |
===Negative reactions=== |
Revision as of 21:29, 27 September 2015
An editor has nominated this article for deletion. You are welcome to participate in the deletion discussion, which will decide whether or not to retain it. |
Seedfeeder is a pseudonymous illustrator known for contributing sexually explicit drawings to Wikipedia. Between 2008 and 2012, the artist created 48 depictions of various sex acts. Seedfeeder's illustrations garnered criticism: some Wikipedia editors claimed they contained racist and sexist undertones, while Andy Cush of Gawker called him "Wikipedia's greatest artist of sex acts". Artnet columnist Paddy Johnson listed Seedfeeder's work as one of the "Top 10 Digital Artworks of 2014".
Work
Seedfeeder contributed 48 drawings of various sex acts to 35 English-language Wikipedia articles;[1] these have also been used in other language editions of Wikipedia. The images are vector graphics with gradient colors and neutral backgrounds.[2] Seedfeeder stated that he was influenced by the simplified style of aircraft safety cards.[2] He contributed drawings to the following Wikipedia articles, among others:[2][3]
- Anal sex[4]
- Anilingus
- Cum shot
- Deep-throating
- Doggy style
- Erotic lactation
- Facial (sex act)[4]
- Fingering (sexual act)
- Fisting
- Frot
- Gokkun
- Gonzo pornography
- Mammary intercourse
- Missionary position
- Pegging (sexual practice)
- Sex position[4]
- Tea bag (sexual act)
- Threesome
- Top, bottom and versatile
- Tribadism
- Woman on top
Seedfeeder retired from Wikipedia in June 2012.[5]
Reception
Seedfinder's images received media coverage in numerous languages and publications.[5]
In 2014, Gawker's Andy Cush published an article about Seedfeeder's "frank, graphic" illustrations,[5] and a companion gallery called "The Best of Seedfeeder, Wikipedia's Greatest Sex Illustrator", which he described as a collection of the artist's "greatest works".[4] In his Gawker piece, Cush called Seedfeeder "Wikipedia's greatest artist of sex acts" and his work "unmistakable" and "nearly as striking as [the] subject matter".[2] Cyriaque Lamar of Cracked.com called the images "goddamn hilarious" and also compared them to airline safety pamphlets. Lamar acknowledged their educational value but criticized them for being too pornographic for pedagogical purposes.[6] The Cracked.com article included a gallery of the six "most terrifying sex illustrations on Wikipedia".[6][7]
The Huffington Post's Andres Jauregui said the illustrations were "anything but shy" and that "by rendering intense acts of coupling in a sterile, almost instructional manner, Seedfeeder's drawings have a normalizing effect on bedroom play that some might consider taboo".[5] He wrote that the sexual acts Seedfeeder illustrates "aren't weird, but the plastic, detached style in which they're rendered is bizarrely matter-of-fact, like the airline safety pamphlets that the illustrator says inspired them". Furthermore, he said: "Some wouldn't consider it art, but it's not porn, either. The drawings are educational, but they serve a purpose beyond illustration."[5]
Artnet columnist Paddy Johnson listed Seedfeeder's work as one of the "Top 10 Digital Artworks of 2014".[8]
Negative reactions
Seedfeeder's drawings were also met with controversy. According to Cush, some Wikipedia contributors perceived there to be racist and sexist undertones, resulting in the removal of some images from English-language Wikimedia projects. Seedfeeder responded to those who argued that descriptions of sex acts alone would be best by saying: "I come from a philosophical viewpoint that every Wikipedia article should have all forms of media available associated with it. Images, audio, and video. All articles, without exception. So any argument predicated on "an image isn't necessary" is one that carries absolutely zero weight. None."[5]
Seedfeeder also responded to criticism that children could discover his illustrations by writing, "if your children are actively searching for these kind of topics... it's because they already have a slight idea of them... and they feel ready to know more."[5]
References
- ^ "Die Geschichte von Wikipedias bekanntestem Sex-Illustrator". dertsandard.at. Retrieved 26 September 2015.
- ^ a b c d Cush, Andy (November 12, 2014). "Wikipedia's Greatest Sex Illustrator Is an Anonymous Legend: Seedfeeder". Gawker. Retrieved November 15, 2014.
- ^ "Can Men Fake Orgasms? And Other Debates on Wikipedia's Sex Pages". Vice Motherboard. Retrieved 26 September 2015.
- ^ a b c d Cush, Andy (November 12, 2014). "The Best of Seedfeeder, Wikipedia's Greatest Sex Illustrator". Gawker. Retrieved November 15, 2014.
- ^ a b c d e f g Jauregui, Andres (November 12, 2014). "Wikipedia's SeedFeeder Is The Weirdest Sex Illustrator You've Never Heard Of (NSFW)". The Huffington Post. Retrieved November 14, 2014.
- ^ a b Lamar, Cyriaque (February 26, 2013). "The 6 Most Terrifying Sex Illustrations on Wikipedia". Cracked.com. Demand Media. p. 1. Retrieved November 14, 2014.
{{cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|work=
(help) - ^ Lamar, Cyriaque (February 26, 2013). "The 6 Most Terrifying Sex Illustrations on Wikipedia". Cracked.com. Demand Media. p. 2. Retrieved November 14, 2014.
{{cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|work=
(help) - ^ Johnson, Paddy. "The Top 10 Digital Artworks of 2014". Artnet News. Retrieved 25 September 2015.
External links
- User:Seedfeeder at Wikipedia
- Janinet, Sophie (November 12, 2014). "Seedfeeder, l'homme qui illustre le sexe sur Wikipédia". Les Inrockuptibles (in French). Les Nouvelles Editions Indépendantes. ISSN 0298-3788.
- "Qui est Seedfeeder, l'iconographe du sexe de Wikipédia ?". Ijsberg Magazine (in French). November 14, 2014.
- González, Jose Ángel (November 17, 2014). "Seedfeeder, el anónimo y mítico ilustrador de la 'guía sexual' de la Wikipedia". 20 minutos (in Spanish).
- Goorwich, Siam (November 29, 2014). "NSFW: Seedfeeder is the greatest X-rated sex artist you've never heard of". Metro. DMG Media.
- Δεμέτης, Χρήστος (November 30, 2014). "Τέχνη ή πορνό; Ο φαντομάς Seedfeeder που έκανε ακατάλληλη τη Wikipedia" (in Greek). News247.gr.
- Balducci, Giulia (December 5, 2014). "Il leggendario illustratore del sesso su Wikipedia". Il Post (in Italian).