User talk:Playnot: Difference between revisions
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
Note this is probably a sock of {{noping|Simpleabd}}. Expect ''a lot'' of unblock requests. --[[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 05:05, 22 October 2015 (UTC) |
Note this is probably a sock of {{noping|Simpleabd}}. Expect ''a lot'' of unblock requests. --[[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 05:05, 22 October 2015 (UTC) |
||
What now. |
|||
Revision as of 05:06, 22 October 2015
October 2015
Your recent editing history at Muhammad in Islam shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NeilN talk to me 23:00, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
I do no violate yet
This is bs.
i have found this. Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted. Encyclopedic content must be verifiable. Work submitted to Wikipedia can be edited, used, and redistributed—by anyone—subject to certain terms and conditions.
October 2015
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Social network. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 02:58, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Playnot reported by User:NeilN (Result: ). Thank you. NeilN talk to me 04:47, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
October 2015
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Black Kite (talk) 04:53, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
What happen.
Playnot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Thank you. NeilN talk to me 04:47, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Black Kite (talk) 04:53, 22 October 2015 (UTC)The time difference is about 6 minutes.
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I receive no serious warning before i received temporary ban. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 04:47, 22 October 2015 (UTC) Black Kite (talk) 04:53, 22 October 2015 (UTC) The time difference is about 6 minutes. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I receive no serious warning before i received temporary ban. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 04:47, 22 October 2015 (UTC) Black Kite (talk) 04:53, 22 October 2015 (UTC) The time difference is about 6 minutes. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I receive no serious warning before i received temporary ban. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 04:47, 22 October 2015 (UTC) Black Kite (talk) 04:53, 22 October 2015 (UTC) The time difference is about 6 minutes. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Note this is probably a sock of Simpleabd. Expect a lot of unblock requests. --NeilN talk to me 05:05, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
What now.