Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CSLRA: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by Srin2015 - "" |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:Okay, this might be a case of [[WP:COI]]. ‑[[User:Ugog Nizdast|Ugog Nizdast]] ([[User talk:Ugog Nizdast|talk]]) 13:00, 17 November 2015 (UTC) |
:Okay, this might be a case of [[WP:COI]]. ‑[[User:Ugog Nizdast|Ugog Nizdast]] ([[User talk:Ugog Nizdast|talk]]) 13:00, 17 November 2015 (UTC) |
||
Sir here in India; mainly in litigation sector hardly any litigation is entertained by Courts in names of organizations. They are generally entertained in the names of persons. This being a new organization; might have engaged into filing of matters in the name of their founders. Nevertheless the same is a good resource. So it should not be deleted. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Srin2015|Srin2015]] ([[User talk:Srin2015|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Srin2015|contribs]]) 16:36, 21 November 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Sir here in India; mainly in litigation sector hardly any litigation is entertained by Courts in names of organizations. They are generally entertained in the names of persons. This being a new organization; might have engaged into filing of matters in the name of their founders. Nevertheless the same is a good resource. So it should not be deleted. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Srin2015|Srin2015]] ([[User talk:Srin2015|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Srin2015|contribs]]) 16:36, 21 November 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
However yet; in case you think that the page is not important enough; I personally request the same be removed.[[User:Srin2015|Srin2015]] ([[User talk:Srin2015|talk]]) 16:45, 21 November 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:46, 21 November 2015
- CSLRA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to fail WP:NGO. Most news sources cited only contain a passing mention of the org's founder. Note: Analysed the major contributor's edits, less likely a WP:SPA and more likely done in good faith ‑Ugog Nizdast (talk) 12:58, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, this might be a case of WP:COI. ‑Ugog Nizdast (talk) 13:00, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Sir here in India; mainly in litigation sector hardly any litigation is entertained by Courts in names of organizations. They are generally entertained in the names of persons. This being a new organization; might have engaged into filing of matters in the name of their founders. Nevertheless the same is a good resource. So it should not be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srin2015 (talk • contribs) 16:36, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
However yet; in case you think that the page is not important enough; I personally request the same be removed.Srin2015 (talk) 16:45, 21 November 2015 (UTC)