User talk:Veera Narayana

The monument you see in this image is the illuminated view of the Sri Venkateswara Swamy Temple located in the hill town of Tirumala in the South Indian state of Andhra Pradesh during the Srivari Brahmotsavam event. Thanks for sparing a moment.

Pelli Chesi Choodu

Your GA nomination of Pelli Chesi Choodu

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pelli Chesi Choodu you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 21:40, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld: a gentle reminder! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:40, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

I thought I reviewed it? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:41, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld: I would be more than happy if that happened actually. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:45, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, I could have sworn I reviewed a GA on the weekend! I'd never have intentionally left it a full week to review it! When I say within a few days I mean it. I'll tackle it a bit later.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:59, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

No worries Doctor. I just want to make sure that you did not forgot it. That's why i gave a reminder! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:04, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Amazing how you managed to get Pelli Chesi Choodu, an article having fewer refs than Kalidas to GA (it had 30-something refs during its GAR). This should convince me and Ssven that Keechaka Vadham can achieve the same. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:10, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

@Kailash29792: I remember Ssven2 saying that he wants to take Keechaka Vadham further on the lines of Si Ronda and Gagak Item. I promised him to review the FAC. Now almost after a month, i am hearing now from you that it is a possible GAN. Whatever it is, i wish you both all the best. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:15, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

BTW, why isn't Kalyanam Panni Paar's soundtrack there on its Wiki article? I acknowledge I was not able to find it online, but a DVD menu of the film would certainly list its songs (that's how I solved the dilemma in Chandralekha). Kailash29792 (talk) 16:24, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

@Kailash29792: Kalyanam Panni Paar is not available at the moment. I really searched for it and failed. IMHO, Pelli Chesi Choodu is one of the most underrated cult films and it was one of those films likened by the one whom i lost to god this September. I consider it a tribute to that person who is very much close to my heart. Coming back, for now the Tamil tracklist is in my sandbox. When i find a reliable source (like DVD, music websites, others), i shall add it. It will just be removed when the feasibility is almost NIL. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:30, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

ZNMD accolades

Hello there! If you have time and interest, please leave your comments in this nomination. It will be much appreciated. -- Frankie _talk 10:16, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Shall tackle it within a few days, Frankie! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:26, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Srimanthudu

I have pretty much finished the copy-edit you requested for Srimanthudu. I have just a few questions for you:

1) In the first paragraph of the section Srimanthudu#Critical reception is the following sentence:

• Sify called Srimanthudu a "right mix of Mahesh's emotional and class performance, Shruthi's charisma, fine storyline and all materials that are needed for a good entertainer".

I'm wondering whether "class performance" should be "classy performance". Since it was a quote, I decided not to change it without asking you.

2) Later in that same paragraph is the following sentence, which is the last sentence in a quote:

• Yet there can be no denying that Srimanthudu achieves more than any big ticket Tollywood potboiler has in more in that last decade, for the simple reason that it is a drama made like one.

There is something not quite clear right after "big ticket Tollywood". It is this part:

• has in more in that last decade.

Are you sure this is copied correctly from the source? Can you check? Do you see how it doesn't sound right? Perhaps it should be:

• Srimanthudu achieves more than any big ticket Tollywood potboiler has in more than the last decade.

3) Early in the article, I changed several instances of "screen" or "screens" to "theatre" or "theatres". Then, later in the article, in the section describing box office receipts, that is, box office gross and net sales of tickets, I again saw "screen" or "screens" used. I was about to change those, too, but then I thought I had better check with you first. Which term do you prefer? Corinne (talk) 00:46, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

@Corinne: Thanks for the elaborate c/e. For the first one, i too felt the same but i kept it unchanged adhering to WP:QUOTE. I agree with you on the second, but again WP:QUOTE comes in the way. For the third one, i would prefer screens. Considering the article's length, i could have made a few mistakes for sure. But i am really amazed with your speed. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:01, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. O.K. We'll leave those two quotes as they are. I think readers can guess that "class performance" means "classy performance", but on the second one, it is so unclear I'm wondering whether we shouldn't add "sic" (a Latin abbreviation that means that that is the way it was in the original) in single square brackets, like this: [sic], after that unclear phrase.

I did add one comma in a quote from a reviewer a little later than those other ones, in the collection of positive reviews. It was a short quote where the reviewer was describing Mahesh Babu as cool and mellow. Do you know which one I mean? You can find it in the edits I made, if you look in the revision history. It was three two-word phrases in a row, and it looked odd without the comma. If you think it should reflect the source exactly, it can be removed (but I've been told by other editors that minor edits like punctuation can be made to a quote).

Regarding "screen" vs. "theatre", do you want me to go back and change all of the ones I had changed? They're all in the first half of the article. Or can you do it? Corinne (talk) 01:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

@Corinne: Can you please add that [sic] there, i'm okay with the second one. I have done the third adjustment myself. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

unconstructive and original research

what is this non sens by you ??? krishna did not allow?? what is this original research non sense?? kindly stop reverting whole content, make changes in sections, dont revert it to original fan pov research, I am also telugu guy only my last name is also jandhyala.

what is this non sense added by you ?? stop ur non sense

Mahesh is considered one of the most popular actors in Telugu cinema, and his popularity has been documented in several Telugu films. Apart from his film career, Mahesh has also been the brand ambassador for various companies in South India. He is also involved in social welfare activities and has given 30% of his annual income to charities. He was signed in 2013 as the goodwill ambassador of Heal-a-child Foundation, a non-profit organization offering financial support for medical expenses to parents of terminally ill children.[citation needed] Pravbv (talk) 13:08, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

dont delete well sourced content from any article

if you want to add information about his philantrophy cite it with sources, and please dont disrupt intro section - Venkata sastry jandhyala Pravbv (talk) 13:11, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

I did not do any edit

I have reverted it to well sourced information. Pravbv (talk) 13:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

unrelated edit summary

stop wasting your time on this article of mahesh babu. Pravbv (talk) 13:15, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

@Pravbv: Do you think that was well sourced? It was re-written from scratch with reliable sources in order to make it a good article, on the lines of Rajinikanth. Your edit was just the reversion to the old, ill-sourced fancruft. How come you call it a valid edit if you remove the reliably sourced controversy section? It could have been a GA by now if editors like you couldn't have made disruptive edits exactly like this and make it unstable. Last but not the least, i don't give a damn to anybody who does these types of things just because he/she speaks Telugu and their surname is Jandhyala. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

your summary and edit do not match any

stop adding un references content Pravbv (talk) 13:21, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

unreferences content

tell me why are you adding unsourced content ? Pravbv (talk) 13:22, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

@Pravbv: How can you say it was unsourced? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:23, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

stop adding un referenced content

cant you understand this ? Pravbv (talk) 13:24, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

@Pravbv: What should i understand? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:24, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Things you should understand: you are reverting to unsourced content, and you are wasting your time, and Kailash's time on SPI investigation, it is not going to stop some one's editing. Kailash is only interested in damaging articles related to Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, and Telugu speaking artists, and articles. Pravbv (talk) 13:32, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Things you should understand

Things you should understand:

you are reverting to unsourced content, and you are wasting your time, and Kailash's time on SPI investigation, it is not going to stop some one's editing. Kailash is only interested in damaging articles related to Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, and Telugu speaking artists, and articles. Pravbv (talk) 13:33, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

@Pravbv: How can you say that "Kailash is only interested in damaging articles related to Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, and Telugu speaking artists, and articles". Obviously i am not taking sides, but i want you to prove that. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:34, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

show me one telugu article

show me one telugu article, that Kailash contributed to good article nomination? he is completely biased, and Tamil oriented, deal with me directly dont influence others for SPI Pravbv (talk) 13:35, 29 November 2015 (UTC)