User talk:McGeddon

Svetlana Penkina is okay

Please do not delete Svetlana Penkina page as it is a piece of history taken from reliable sources, accompanied with external links to Russian sources, as well as the Internet Movie Database. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SGost (talk • contribs) 14:29, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Response from rouge

Thx for the response I appreciate it, I honestly thought the same as you and told my clan the same, I am going to use that link you sent me thx again for that, I didn't know about that and I look forward to useing wikipedia in the future for a more profetional use. Thx again and I understand why you deleted that page and I honestly didn't think that I would be able to make a wiki page but my clan insisted on me doing it. By the way you don't to act like you have a respect for gamer clans II honestly don't I'm in it because my brother is the leader of it.

Fen Research

I feel like it being the new brainchild of Andrew Gower gives it more then enough reason to be its own article, there isn't much to it at the moment, but its a legitimate company who is creating their own engine for gods sakes. THAT is something significant. Jmanghan (talk) 13:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Help with Jarret Myer

Hi McGeddon, I'm looking for someone to review updates I've proposed to the Jarret Myer article. Myer is the founder of the website Uproxx. I noticed you edited the Buzzfeed article recently, so I thought you might be interested in a related media topic. I should note, I'm working on behalf of Uproxx to propose these changes, but as an editor with a financial conflict of interest, I will not be making any direct edits to the article. Instead, I would appreciate it if you could review my proposed changes and make any that seem reasonable. Thanks! Heatherer (talk) 17:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Sorry User:McGeddon but according to Rick Riordan (who probably millions of people listen to) the Empire State Building is home to Mount Olympus and the Gods so...Max97121 (talk) 03:49, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Martin Jacoby (composer)

A page I created 'Martin Jacoby (composer)' has been marked proposed deletion. I have supplied references including the official website. However it is still claiming no in-depth secondary sources. Please help Thanks LewisPWS (talk) 16:59, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Screw you

Screw you. Really. My first wiki page and you just cant leave it how it is, can you? Leaving wiki, thanks! I dunno why you have to be so annoying, I think the fact, that the STARS of the movie post photos of themselves while FILMING, is enough but okay. Suck it. Mysterycooper (talk) 09:59, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Please help me out to add company detail on wikipedia

Hi, I just want to share information about Indian Consulting firm. I don't have intention to advertise company or website, as its is first article that's why my content should me puffery. Please guide me what changes i have to make to publish this article.

Acquisory is become popular as consulting firm and has some reliable news from Times of india and ecomics times , you can check through https://www.google.co.in/webhp?hl=en#q=acquisory&hl=en&tbm=nws link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pay9891 (talk • contribs) 05:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Re: Chris Beal prod

Hi McGeddon,

There have been several past discussions at WT:PROD about whether articles deleted at AFD and later recreated can be prodded. See WT:Proposed_deletion/Archive_13#AFD_Zombies for one such discussion. While there has been some disagreement, in general the majority of participants in the discussions have said that if an article was deleted at AFD, then a later article on the same subject can't be deleted by prod. Neither the title nor the contents of the article are the main factor to consider, but instead whether the subject of the article is the same as the subject discussed at AFD. So if the new article is about the same Chris Beale discussed at AFD, then the new article can't be deleted by prod (regardless of if the article is completely rewritten). There is less agreement on whether prod can be used when a new article has the same title as an old article but is on a different subject. In general, I've noticed that prods of articles that happen to have the same title as an article discussed at AFD but are actually about a different subject are allowed to stand. In this case though the article seemed to be about the same person who was discussed at AFD, so prod wouldn't be usable on it. Calathan (talk) 19:53, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Generation Z

The lede language has been in place since 2013 and it's written very clearly yet you keep changing it to something watered down. There are different dates and it's okay to say it in a precise way unless you have new sources that say otherwise. 2606:6000:610A:9000:9B4:4B49:15DD:7D82 (talk) 17:43, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Drinking culture in Australia

An article that you have been involved in editing—Drinking culture in Australia —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Tiggerjay (talk) 08:03, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Lost edits to The Plaque, Winnipeg

I know you think this is a trite article, but it's not trite to me and I'm very frustrated with how I'm being treated. You are all experts and I am nobody, so therefore you just trample all over me. I spent a couple of hours tonight trying sincerely to answer the concerns about notability and references with links and rewriting and then poof they all disappeared because somebody posted an alert at the top of all my edits. I am so angry I could spit. It's no way to run a railroad, as they say. RobLab (talk) 03:41, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Blind Love

Hi McGeddon,

Thanks for you recent edit to Blind Love. The journalist (Ron Csillag) from JTA who covered the story made an error regarding the credits for the film The producers were Eli Rubenstein and Naomi Wise The director was Eli Rubenstein. You can confirm this by watching the trailer at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OYOmHTw1jQ

Hope this is clear, Thanks.

(Uiaeli (talk) 13:52, 22 December 2015 (UTC))

I explain

Hi McGeddon! I just want to explain to you that this is not this is NOT a shared IP adress. This IP belongs to a humble home. The guy who was a vandal USED to live here. He moved out of here. He was like a third grader and left with his momma. He is NOT me. Just someone who lived in our house. I recently moved here and abandoned my old IP which I am maintaining. This ain't a shared IP. Please do not screw up my talk page again. Alot of users like me. 50.179.194.186 (talk) 14:25, 22 December 2015 (UTC)