Talk:1000 Piazzia: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:13, 27 December 2015

Astronomy: Astronomical objects Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

Astronomy: Solar System Unassessed

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force.

The links/references provided can not be the sole sources if information in this article, I am adding {{unreferenced}} Jeepday 04:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

This has been tagged for notabiltiy, so opening discussion. Like all asteroids under 2000, needs discussion before redirecting/keeping as is. Pinging tagger Carbon6 and creator Python eggs. If found non-notable, redirection to List of minor planets: 1–1000 would be the best option. Boleyn (talk) 18:01, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unlike the case with 501 Urhixidur, this asteroid is a smaller main-belt asteroid that appears to lack enough data to make it notable. I would support a redirect unless more data can be found to prove its notability. Carbon 6 21:13, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 18:02, 27 December 2015 edit Boleyn (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 303,670 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:13, 27 December 2015 edit undo Carbon6 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,069 edits →‎Notability Next edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:

	This has been tagged for notabiltiy, so opening discussion. Like all asteroids under 2000, needs discussion before redirecting/keeping as is. Pinging tagger {{u\|Carbon6}} and creator {{u\|Python eggs}}. If found non-notable, redirection to [[List of minor planets: 1–1000]] would be the best option. [[User:Boleyn\|Boleyn]] ([[User talk:Boleyn\|talk]]) 18:01, 27 December 2015 (UTC)		This has been tagged for notabiltiy, so opening discussion. Like all asteroids under 2000, needs discussion before redirecting/keeping as is. Pinging tagger {{u\|Carbon6}} and creator {{u\|Python eggs}}. If found non-notable, redirection to [[List of minor planets: 1–1000]] would be the best option. [[User:Boleyn\|Boleyn]] ([[User talk:Boleyn\|talk]]) 18:01, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

			:Unlike the case with [[501 Urhixidur]], this asteroid is a smaller main-belt asteroid that appears to lack enough data to make it notable. I would support a redirect unless more data can be found to prove its notability. '''''[[User:Carbon6\|<span style="color:#646464">Carbon</span>]][[User talk:Carbon6\|<span style="color:#FF6E00">6</span>]]''''' 21:13, 27 December 2015 (UTC)