User talk:212.186.0.108

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 16:52, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Also please don't tell other IP users that they're not allowed to edit. If you're allowed to add something then they're allowed to remove that something, administrators don't have the final say in content disputes, all editors are equal. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 16:54, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

I've told him not to undo any worthy edit, like mine, unless it's obvious vandalism. --212.186.0.108 (talk) 21:34, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Why? Not all improvements are about adding and adding more stuff. There's no rule here saying that IPs aren't allowed to remove things if they provide a valid reason, which he did. (Either way both of you were getting close to edit warring so I gave these warnings to you both.) — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 21:39, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Well, but what do you wanna reach with this talk? I left the article already alone before you talked to me. And no, he didn't provide a valid reason, but a subjective one. My edits (Irlmaier prophecy) shall be added to the article, I've also given a source, it's worthy information which can even save lifes. --212.186.0.108 (talk) 21:43, 7 January 2016 (UTC)