Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rasta (Congo): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
sources on article talk page
Line 15: Line 15:
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 07:12, 12 January 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Rasta (Congo)]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 07:12, 12 January 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Rasta (Congo)]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
* '''Keep''' A quick google search turned up another source (http://www.irinnews.org/printreport.aspx?reportid=73567). --[[User:Banana04131|Banana]] ([[User talk:Banana04131|talk]]) 09:53, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' A quick google search turned up another source (http://www.irinnews.org/printreport.aspx?reportid=73567). --[[User:Banana04131|Banana]] ([[User talk:Banana04131|talk]]) 09:53, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
: Added other sources that came up on article's talk page. --[[User:Banana04131|Banana]] ([[User talk:Banana04131|talk]]) 10:01, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:01, 17 January 2016

Rasta (Congo) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one reference (it's the New York Times but we only have one article there) leading me to wonder if this name ever 'caught on'. Also, even though the reference is the Times there is something odd about the description.

The one reference names the Rasta as one group among those that are a topic of that article and may be quoting a non-authoritative source the name. (i.e. the Rasta are in the article rather than an article about 'them'.)

Without further referencing I think we should delete the article (after having it tagged for clean up since 2007). RJFJR (talk) 18:08, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:01, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:01, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:12, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Added other sources that came up on article's talk page. --Banana (talk) 10:01, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]