Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Rahif Hakmi: Difference between revisions
Requested to Keep - Added several reliable sources |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*'''Redirect''' to [[Aramada Group]], as it's just [[WP:PROMO|spam]] about a [[WP:GNG|non-notable person]]. [[User:Joseph2302|Joseph2302]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk]]) 20:47, 14 January 2016 (UTC) |
*'''Redirect''' to [[Aramada Group]], as it's just [[WP:PROMO|spam]] about a [[WP:GNG|non-notable person]]. [[User:Joseph2302|Joseph2302]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk]]) 20:47, 14 January 2016 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' - clearly doesn't pass [[WP:GNG]], as no in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources could be found. Would also qualify for deletion under [[WP:DEL4]]. [[User:onel5969|<b><font color="#536895">Onel</font><font color="#FFB300">5969</font></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:Onel5969|<i style="color:blue">TT me</i>]]</sup> 14:17, 18 January 2016 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - clearly doesn't pass [[WP:GNG]], as no in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources could be found. Would also qualify for deletion under [[WP:DEL4]]. [[User:onel5969|<b><font color="#536895">Onel</font><font color="#FFB300">5969</font></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:Onel5969|<i style="color:blue">TT me</i>]]</sup> 14:17, 18 January 2016 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' Multiple media sources cited. The lack of a claim of notability and support for that claim is the issue here. Need for "better sourcing" is an argument to improve the article and the claim that "a better article overall" is desired. I have found and added several primary & secondary reliable sources that provide significant coverage. |
|||
** http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f9063e30-71dd-11e1-8497-00144feab49a.html |
|||
** http://www.khaleejtimes.com/article/20050228/ARTICLE/302289958/1036 |
|||
** http://gulfnews.com/business/property/uae-market-will-rise-to-dh230b-in-seven-years-1.279451 |
|||
** http://gulfnews.com/business/sectors/markets/local-real-estate-market-bullish-1.325877 |
|||
Will try to keep adding more reliable sources to the subject. |
|||
Please point me in the right direction to improve it further. |
Revision as of 16:37, 18 January 2016
- Mohammed Rahif Hakmi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't appear to meet notability guidelines WP:GNG or WP:BIO. I can't see any significant coverage from reliable sources. Author of several academic papers doesn't suffice, "businessman of the year" is certainly a claim of significance but a) I'm not sure it's sufficient, and b) I can't see how this is backed up by the cited ref (english translation). Article reads more like a CV, and has seemingly largely been edited by it's subject, and another editor with close ties to Hakmi's company (a concern I've listed at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard). Have tagged the article as having been written with a clear conflict of interest. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 22:12, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Human3015Let It Go 18:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Human3015Let It Go 18:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Human3015Let It Go 18:31, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete for now or also at best redirect to Aramada Group as none of this suggests a better solid encyclopedia article. SwisterTwister talk 02:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Strong delete. Promotional autobiography by non-notable subject. Maproom (talk) 09:20, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom , Clearly promotional and fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:30, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect to Aramada Group, as it's just spam about a non-notable person. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:47, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - clearly doesn't pass WP:GNG, as no in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources could be found. Would also qualify for deletion under WP:DEL4. Onel5969 TT me 14:17, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Multiple media sources cited. The lack of a claim of notability and support for that claim is the issue here. Need for "better sourcing" is an argument to improve the article and the claim that "a better article overall" is desired. I have found and added several primary & secondary reliable sources that provide significant coverage.
- http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f9063e30-71dd-11e1-8497-00144feab49a.html
- http://www.khaleejtimes.com/article/20050228/ARTICLE/302289958/1036
- http://gulfnews.com/business/property/uae-market-will-rise-to-dh230b-in-seven-years-1.279451
- http://gulfnews.com/business/sectors/markets/local-real-estate-market-bullish-1.325877
Will try to keep adding more reliable sources to the subject. Please point me in the right direction to improve it further.