Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Rahif Hakmi: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Requested to Keep - Added several reliable sources
Line 13: Line 13:
*'''Redirect''' to [[Aramada Group]], as it's just [[WP:PROMO|spam]] about a [[WP:GNG|non-notable person]]. [[User:Joseph2302|Joseph2302]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk]]) 20:47, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
*'''Redirect''' to [[Aramada Group]], as it's just [[WP:PROMO|spam]] about a [[WP:GNG|non-notable person]]. [[User:Joseph2302|Joseph2302]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk]]) 20:47, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - clearly doesn't pass [[WP:GNG]], as no in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources could be found. Would also qualify for deletion under [[WP:DEL4]]. [[User:onel5969|<b><font color="#536895">Onel</font><font color="#FFB300">5969</font></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:Onel5969|<i style="color:blue">TT me</i>]]</sup> 14:17, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - clearly doesn't pass [[WP:GNG]], as no in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources could be found. Would also qualify for deletion under [[WP:DEL4]]. [[User:onel5969|<b><font color="#536895">Onel</font><font color="#FFB300">5969</font></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:Onel5969|<i style="color:blue">TT me</i>]]</sup> 14:17, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Multiple media sources cited. The lack of a claim of notability and support for that claim is the issue here. Need for "better sourcing" is an argument to improve the article and the claim that "a better article overall" is desired. I have found and added several primary & secondary reliable sources that provide significant coverage.
** http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f9063e30-71dd-11e1-8497-00144feab49a.html
** http://www.khaleejtimes.com/article/20050228/ARTICLE/302289958/1036
** http://gulfnews.com/business/property/uae-market-will-rise-to-dh230b-in-seven-years-1.279451
** http://gulfnews.com/business/sectors/markets/local-real-estate-market-bullish-1.325877

Will try to keep adding more reliable sources to the subject.
Please point me in the right direction to improve it further.

Revision as of 16:37, 18 January 2016

Mohammed Rahif Hakmi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet notability guidelines WP:GNG or WP:BIO. I can't see any significant coverage from reliable sources. Author of several academic papers doesn't suffice, "businessman of the year" is certainly a claim of significance but a) I'm not sure it's sufficient, and b) I can't see how this is backed up by the cited ref (english translation). Article reads more like a CV, and has seemingly largely been edited by it's subject, and another editor with close ties to Hakmi's company (a concern I've listed at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard). Have tagged the article as having been written with a clear conflict of interest. UkPaolo/talk 22:12, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Human3015Let It Go  18:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Human3015Let It Go  18:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Human3015Let It Go  18:31, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Will try to keep adding more reliable sources to the subject. Please point me in the right direction to improve it further.