Jump to content

Talk:Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 18: Line 18:
... English is an "internationally agreed upon system" (other than gobbeldygook)? [[User:Maelli|Maelli]] ([[User talk:Maelli|talk]]) 12:56, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
... English is an "internationally agreed upon system" (other than gobbeldygook)? [[User:Maelli|Maelli]] ([[User talk:Maelli|talk]]) 12:56, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
:Its a system. its been agreed on internationally. at least it doesnt say "system with coordinated international support, consultation, agreement, implementation and feeback". we cant make it any more plain than this: maybe "The world is up for this program".(mercurywoodrose)[[Special:Contributions/50.193.19.66|50.193.19.66]] ([[User talk:50.193.19.66|talk]]) 16:51, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
:Its a system. its been agreed on internationally. at least it doesnt say "system with coordinated international support, consultation, agreement, implementation and feeback". we cant make it any more plain than this: maybe "The world is up for this program".(mercurywoodrose)[[Special:Contributions/50.193.19.66|50.193.19.66]] ([[User talk:50.193.19.66|talk]]) 16:51, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Ummm...perfectly understandable English?


==symbols==
==symbols==

Revision as of 11:54, 18 February 2016

Comment

This article reads like a pamphlet... Does someone have the time to clean it up? 64.231.106.61 (talk) 01:18, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try and clean it up a bit Gk007 (talk) 05:48, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know enough about the GHS to find citations, though. So I'll do some clean up, but if someone else could to the citations that would be great. Gk007 (talk) 06:26, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of ....

... English is an "internationally agreed upon system" (other than gobbeldygook)? Maelli (talk) 12:56, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Its a system. its been agreed on internationally. at least it doesnt say "system with coordinated international support, consultation, agreement, implementation and feeback". we cant make it any more plain than this: maybe "The world is up for this program".(mercurywoodrose)50.193.19.66 (talk) 16:51, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm...perfectly understandable English?

symbols

We should include the suite of major symbols in the article. we have templates here, and svg files from the commons, to choose from.(mercurywoodrose)50.193.19.66 (talk) 16:55, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Handmade sublists

In § Hazard classification, under subhead Hazard classes, I've used bullet lists in items 4 & 5 to clarify the subdivisions. But I had to insert bullets by hand, using <br>• rather than wikicode, so that the paragraphs following the subdivisions (but still in the same item) don't break the main numbered list of items. Thnidu (talk) 15:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may use #* Text in such cases. --Leyo 16:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]