Scale factor (cosmology): Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Cyberbot II (talk | contribs) Rescuing 1 sources. #IABot |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
where the dot represents a time [[derivative]]. From the previous equation <math>d(t) = d_0 a(t)</math> one can see that <math>\dot{d}(t) = d_0 \dot{a}(t)</math>, and also that <math>d_0 = \frac{d(t)}{a(t)}</math>, so combining these gives <math>\dot{d}(t) = \frac{d(t) \dot{a}(t)}{a(t)}</math>, and substituting the above definition of the Hubble parameter gives <math>\dot{d}(t) = H d(t)</math> which is just [[Hubble's law]]. |
where the dot represents a time [[derivative]]. From the previous equation <math>d(t) = d_0 a(t)</math> one can see that <math>\dot{d}(t) = d_0 \dot{a}(t)</math>, and also that <math>d_0 = \frac{d(t)}{a(t)}</math>, so combining these gives <math>\dot{d}(t) = \frac{d(t) \dot{a}(t)}{a(t)}</math>, and substituting the above definition of the Hubble parameter gives <math>\dot{d}(t) = H d(t)</math> which is just [[Hubble's law]]. |
||
Current evidence suggests that [[Accelerating universe|the expansion rate of the universe is accelerating]], which means that the second derivative of the scale factor <math>\ddot{a}(t)</math> is positive, or equivalently that the first derivative <math>\dot{a}(t)</math> is increasing over time.<ref>{{cite book | last = Jones | first = Mark H. |author2=Robert J. Lambourne | title = An Introduction to Galaxies and Cosmology | publisher =Cambridge University Press | date= 2004 | page = [http://books.google.com/books?id=36K1PfetZegC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA244#v=onepage&q&f=false 244] | isbn = 978-0-521-83738-5 }}</ref> This also implies that any given galaxy recedes from us with increasing speed over time, i.e. for that galaxy <math>\dot{d}(t)</math> is increasing with time. In contrast, the Hubble parameter seems to be ''decreasing'' with time, meaning that if we were to look at some ''fixed'' distance d and watch a series of different galaxies pass that distance, later galaxies would pass that distance at a smaller velocity than earlier ones.<ref>[http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?number=575 Is the universe expanding faster than the speed of light?] (see final paragraph) |
Current evidence suggests that [[Accelerating universe|the expansion rate of the universe is accelerating]], which means that the second derivative of the scale factor <math>\ddot{a}(t)</math> is positive, or equivalently that the first derivative <math>\dot{a}(t)</math> is increasing over time.<ref>{{cite book | last = Jones | first = Mark H. |author2=Robert J. Lambourne | title = An Introduction to Galaxies and Cosmology | publisher =Cambridge University Press | date= 2004 | page = [http://books.google.com/books?id=36K1PfetZegC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA244#v=onepage&q&f=false 244] | isbn = 978-0-521-83738-5 }}</ref> This also implies that any given galaxy recedes from us with increasing speed over time, i.e. for that galaxy <math>\dot{d}(t)</math> is increasing with time. In contrast, the Hubble parameter seems to be ''decreasing'' with time, meaning that if we were to look at some ''fixed'' distance d and watch a series of different galaxies pass that distance, later galaxies would pass that distance at a smaller velocity than earlier ones.<ref>[http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?number=575 Is the universe expanding faster than the speed of light?] (see final paragraph) {{wayback|url=http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?number=575 |date=20101128035752 }}</ref> |
||
According to the [[Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker metric]] which is used to model the expanding universe, if at the present time we receive light from a distant object with a [[redshift]] of ''z'', then the scale factor at the time the object originally emitted that light is <math>a(t) = \frac{1}{1 + z}</math>.<ref>Davies, Paul (1992), ''The New Physics'', [http://books.google.com/books?id=akb2FpZSGnMC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA187#v=onepage&q&f=false p. 187].</ref><ref>Mukhanov, V. F. (2005), ''Physical Foundations of Cosmology'', [http://books.google.com/books?id=1TXO7GmwZFgC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA58#v=onepage&q&f=false p. 58].</ref> |
According to the [[Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker metric]] which is used to model the expanding universe, if at the present time we receive light from a distant object with a [[redshift]] of ''z'', then the scale factor at the time the object originally emitted that light is <math>a(t) = \frac{1}{1 + z}</math>.<ref>Davies, Paul (1992), ''The New Physics'', [http://books.google.com/books?id=akb2FpZSGnMC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA187#v=onepage&q&f=false p. 187].</ref><ref>Mukhanov, V. F. (2005), ''Physical Foundations of Cosmology'', [http://books.google.com/books?id=1TXO7GmwZFgC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA58#v=onepage&q&f=false p. 58].</ref> |
Revision as of 18:30, 28 February 2016
The scale factor, cosmic scale factor or sometimes the Robertson-Walker scale factor[1] parameter of the Friedmann equations is a function of time which represents the relative expansion of the universe. It relates the proper distance (which can change over time, unlike the comoving distance which is constant) between a pair of objects, e.g. two galaxy clusters, moving with the Hubble flow in an expanding or contracting FLRW universe at any arbitrary time to their distance at some reference time . The formula for this is:
where is the proper distance at epoch , is the distance at the reference time and is the scale factor.[2] Thus, by definition, .
The scale factor is dimensionless, with counted from the birth of the universe and set to the present age of the universe: [3] giving the current value of as or .
The evolution of the scale factor is a dynamical question, determined by the equations of general relativity, which are presented in the case of a locally isotropic, locally homogeneous universe by the Friedmann equations.
The Hubble parameter is defined:
where the dot represents a time derivative. From the previous equation one can see that , and also that , so combining these gives , and substituting the above definition of the Hubble parameter gives which is just Hubble's law.
Current evidence suggests that the expansion rate of the universe is accelerating, which means that the second derivative of the scale factor is positive, or equivalently that the first derivative is increasing over time.[4] This also implies that any given galaxy recedes from us with increasing speed over time, i.e. for that galaxy is increasing with time. In contrast, the Hubble parameter seems to be decreasing with time, meaning that if we were to look at some fixed distance d and watch a series of different galaxies pass that distance, later galaxies would pass that distance at a smaller velocity than earlier ones.[5]
According to the Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker metric which is used to model the expanding universe, if at the present time we receive light from a distant object with a redshift of z, then the scale factor at the time the object originally emitted that light is .[6][7]
See also
References
- ^ Steven Weinberg (2008). Cosmology. Oxford University Press. p. 3. ISBN 978-0-19-852682-7.
- ^ Schutz, Bernard (2003). Gravity from the Ground Up: An Introductory Guide to Gravity and General Relativity. Cambridge University Press. p. 363. ISBN 978-0-521-45506-0.
- ^ Planck Collaboration (2015). "Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters (See Table 4 on page 31 of pfd)". arXiv:1502.01589.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) - ^ Jones, Mark H.; Robert J. Lambourne (2004). An Introduction to Galaxies and Cosmology. Cambridge University Press. p. 244. ISBN 978-0-521-83738-5.
- ^ Is the universe expanding faster than the speed of light? (see final paragraph) Template:Wayback
- ^ Davies, Paul (1992), The New Physics, p. 187.
- ^ Mukhanov, V. F. (2005), Physical Foundations of Cosmology, p. 58.