User talk:104.162.193.17

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Tanbircdq (talk) 12:23, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Discretionary sanctions notice

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 Tanbircdq (talk) 12:23, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

500/30 issue

Hi. I see that you are participating in articles that concern the Israel-Palestine conflict. There was a rule passed in November of last year that says that everyone who edits that subject must have at least thirty days' experience and at least five hundred edits: Here I don't know if this means you must withdraw your AE filing against Opdire; my guess is that it does not. Generally, one violation does not cancel out someone else's However, if this was a good-faith mistake, you should establish a non-anonymous account and take at least a month to build your reputation on Wikipedia through productive edits. This isn't a formality. It helps new users learn the ropes and rules in places where the consequences for accidentally breaking them aren't as dire. Good luck. Darkfrog24 (talk) 17:49, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello 104.162.193.17. As an IP editor you are banned from editing ARBPIA articles such as Eilabun massacre and Arab Higher Committee. Please cease. You are risking a block. Come back with a registered account after satisfying the 500/30 rule. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 17:40, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Blocked for continuing to edit ARBPIA material with an IP

To enforce an arbitration decision you have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 

---

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Per this edit of a category related to the Arab-Israeli conflict you are blocked three days. I had previously given you a warning with this message. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:46, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Since you resumed editing of WP:ARBPIA topics after the last block expired, I have now blocked you for three months. If you disagree with this block, the instructions for appealing an AE block are those given in the template above. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:08, 3 March 2016 (UTC)