Jump to content

User talk:CUA 27: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by Nunber 57 (talk) to last version by CUA 27
→‎USA Rugby: new section
Line 134: Line 134:


:: [[User:Smashem|Smashem]] — is that you? [[User:CUA 27|CUA 27]] ([[User talk:CUA 27#top|talk]]) 02:57, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
:: [[User:Smashem|Smashem]] — is that you? [[User:CUA 27|CUA 27]] ([[User talk:CUA 27#top|talk]]) 02:57, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

== USA Rugby ==

Hi, the [[USA Rugby League]] hatnote at the top of [[USA Rugby]] is to allow Americans (or anyone else for that matter) looking for the similar titled [[Rugby league]] competition to easily find it. Putting a link to USARL in the see also section of USA Rugby, which is exclusively about the [[Rugby union]] organisation does not work as USARL is a page for a completely different sport, it would be like putting a link to MLS there, it wouldn't work. Thx :) [[Special:Contributions/90.214.98.93|90.214.98.93]] ([[User talk:90.214.98.93|talk]]) 17:15, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:15, 24 March 2016

CUA_27

Phoenix

Just wanted to say welcome to Wikipedia. Like your edits on Phoenix, nicely streamlines the article. Onel5969 TT me 23:56, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hello

Hi cua 27 i saw that you have edited the concacaf page, i have an original posters frim the competition of 1963 and 1969, if you want you can put like an historic poster as the world cup posters, anyways i hope to receive yiur respond thanks ... Albergo228 (talk) 06:26, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

College rugby

The Lindenwood and New England edits were done as per the schools' websites. Although Lindenwood's women's rugby might very well become a varsity sport, it is currently a club sport, one of 20 sponsored by their Student Life Sports Department which administers their non-NCAA, non-varsity sports, not by their Athletics Department which handles the varsity NCAA sports. And, while Life University initially announced that they would begin women's varsity rugby "...as early as 2015-16..." and are currently fielding a team this fall, they officially held off the move to varsity status until 2016, and they are not yet sanctioned by the NCAA.

Penn, Princeton, and Yale were included because they are currently competing in "Conference Games" against other Ivy League schools that have already been sanctioned and approved by the NCAA, indicating a likelihood of their own imminent sanctioning...

As for your statement that, "...The sources say what they say..." being said does not automatically make something true— especially when it can be shown that, in point of fact, the sources were wrong... As Abraham Lincoln said, "Just because it's on the internet, that does not necessarily make it true..." GWFrog (talk) 03:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@GWFrog: Thanks for the note. I have undone by change to the University of New England as I had been relying on an outdated cite; I added a more updated cite so that other editors don't repeat my mistake. Re Penn, Princeton, and Yale – I haven't seen anything saying they are varsity; if you think they may become varsity and/or NCAA sanctioned soon, it seems premature to add them to the list now; perhaps it would be better to add them to the table when that happens. And on your point re Lindenwood and sources, we're getting here into WP:TRUTH; I'd rather just leave as-is and point out the conflicting cites. CUA 27 (talk) 03:56, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bandy

Hello. I would appreciate your input in the discussion at Talk:Bandy#Top importance. Thanks in advance. Snowsuit Wearer (talk|contribs) 21:00, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 29 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Demographics of San Francisco city) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Demographics of San Francisco city, CUA 27!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This should be probably be moved to the more succinct and stylistically proper title Demographics of San Francisco (currently a redirect).

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Reference errors on 15 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NRU

Hi there - whatever personal notability guide a WikiProject has come up with is always subservient to a encyclopedia-wide notability guidelines. See WP:LOCALCONSENSUS. At the very most Wikipedia:WikiProject Rugby union/Notability should be a redirect to WP:NRU. GiantSnowman 18:24, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Condominiums in Canada, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://ubresort.com/condominium.html.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:54, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PRO Rugby

All I'm worried about is the table I created. I personally don't see anything wrong with it other than it has more information than what you insist. The NFL, NBA and NHL articles all have the exact same information table?

Regards, JS 22:30, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Teams of pro rugby

I reverted my edit. If you prefer it how you like it, I'll leave it alone from now on.

Regards, JS 02:44, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

PRO Rugby

Is this table okay?

JS 02:56, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

PRO rugby

I agree with your response. I'll leave the table alone until everything is finalized.

Regards, JS 08:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Wiki project

Hey mate, would you like to help me with a project? I'm trying to create a new infobox for rugby national teams and was wondering if you'd like to create/finish it off. On my user page it will show what I have done so far. Get back to me if interested.

Regards, JS 22:08, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

National team infoboxes

Thanks for your feedback. The infobox is all yours for the taking. I don't have the knowledge to know how to create one. So you can do what you'd like with it, make changes ect. It's up to you whether you'd like to create it.

Thanks, JS 23:14, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Template:Infobox national rugby team

Nope, I don't think so. But if you have any concerns, please add to the articles talk page.

Thanks, Kidsoljah (talk) 04:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Smashem — is that you? CUA 27 (talk) 02:57, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

USA Rugby

Hi, the USA Rugby League hatnote at the top of USA Rugby is to allow Americans (or anyone else for that matter) looking for the similar titled Rugby league competition to easily find it. Putting a link to USARL in the see also section of USA Rugby, which is exclusively about the Rugby union organisation does not work as USARL is a page for a completely different sport, it would be like putting a link to MLS there, it wouldn't work. Thx :) 90.214.98.93 (talk) 17:15, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]